"1971 war was won by Pakistan" Is she serious? even an autistic kid has a better grasp of history
You should go thorough this thread and others and read what members have written about
Pakistaniyat. And also what Chritine (Un)Fair has written many a time.
For
Napakis, victory is not winning in a battle or war. It's the ability to live again to fight another day. They lost every war, almost every battle, but they lived to fight another day. They were not killed, they were not destroyed, they were not vanquished. For
Napakis, that is victory.
Do remember, you are not dealing with a rational entity. They see themselves as the true descendants of the marauding Islamists of the yore and in their conceited thinking believe that they are destined to do the same to
kaafir. Deep down they fully realise that they are nothing but bastards of conquest, whose ancestors were weak and submissive and chose to lay down their faith, their women, their land and children to the marauders than standing up and fighting.
Over the years, this inferiority has morphed into bitterness and bitterness into impotent rage and neurosis. So they started to concoct canards that they were not the subjugated, but the subjugators- hence you'll see frenetic attempts to cook up some fake Arab-Turkish ancestry by most
Napaki elite. That is meant to justify their overlordship over the
aam abdul and
ayesha, since the latter were the ones who were subjugated by the "former".
Years of inbreeding, Islam, socio-politico-economic failure is a potent cocktail that has rendered them increasingly neurotic, psychotic, unhinged, yet cunning and extremely dangerous. This is why they initiated wars with India and after being beaten back every time, they refused to believe that they were weak and stupid. So they embarked on a different strategy-
1. Propagate the myth that it was actually the
Napakis who won every war and only reason they could not "go for the kill" was because Indian went "crying and begging to jews and
magribhi kaafir"
2. When it was not possible to completely deny their loss as in 1971, they came up with further twisted arguments
a. India failed to destroy Pakistan and declared a ceasefire because they were afraid and quit while they were
temporarily ahead.
b. They started spreading the canard that these setback were because they lacked "enough Islam". Hence the
increased attempts towards Islamization of the society.
Napakis are a dog, a
chornai (Tamil speaking members will probably understand this better) in fact, that will bite its own tail and then claim that they won because India was unable to tear the tail off their body.