Launch MH17: New suspicions against the Government of Ukraine
German Economic News | Published: 10/11/14, 3:14 | 71 comments
The Federal Government has admitted in response to a request from the left party that she knows nothing definite about the downing of Flight MH17. However,
it acknowledges that AWACS aircraft have located a missile as it is owned by the Ukrainian army. Emirates CEO Tim Clarke not preclude the MH-17 was shot down by a Ukrainian missile defense system.
The Federal Government has in a little request the left party information given about the launch of the MH-17. logs you on the use of AWACS reconnaissance aircraft of the type in the region:
"The AWACS detected signals from an air defense missile system and another can not be assigned by AWACS radar signal in their view area. The air defense system was automated by AWACS as, Surface to Air Missile 'classified SA-3, one in the region routinely detected signal. "
The radar-guided anti-aircraft system SA-3 GOA was developed in 1961 in the Soviet Union. , it can be transported on trucks and trailers and has a maximum range of 25 kilometers.
There have total of 31 States on the SA-3 GOA. These include above all former Warsaw Pact countries such as Ukraine. Yet in Russia, the SA-3 GOA was replaced by the S-300 and is now scrapped .
A modernized version of the SA-3 GOA sets the Ukraine since 2010, reports Aero Technica .
Member of the Bundestag faction of the Left, New Alexander, the German Economic News said:
"The launch of the MH-17 remains dubious. Shortly before the launch, the aircraft disappeared from the education area of the two AWACS machines . There is no evidence of a kill by the Ukraine nor Russia or the rebels.
Yet the federal government is to blame for early Looking at the Russians and rebels. This means that the Russia sanctions were justified. Now she admits that she actually knows nothing definite about the shooting. "
That MH17 was deliberately shot down by a missile defense system , also thinks the boss of the airline Emirates Airlines, Tim Clark:
" All I know is, how complex were the weapons that were used : the need for tracking devices to detect what they wanted to shoot. And such, in order to identify it and the data to load from the vehicle control in the missile control, so that the rocket could attach to your destination. This was not a heat-seeking missile . She could to 79,000 foot climb (24,079 meters). So it was up to 79,000 feet a risk, but we do not fly as high as you would have almost a satellite can shoot with. We must ask these questions and need answers. This was a criminal act, I would call it premeditated murder. "
In an interview with airliners.de Clark also reports that he had no idea of laying any missile defense systems in Eastern Ukraine .
Clark says:
" No, I personally had no idea of that this type of weapon systems were installed in the east of the country . And I had known that, I would definitely not have been happy about it. Today, however, it is clear that some people knew about it. But I do not blame them, that's all very difficult. The sensitivities to pass on information derived from secret apparatuses of various countries are already shrouded in mystery of the nature of the matter. "
Abschuss MH17: Neuer Verdacht gegen die Regierung der Ukraine | DEUTSCHE WIRTSCHAFTS NACHRICHTEN
#################
As translated by Google translate.