johnee
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 3,473
- Likes
- 499
Mate,yes you are right,secularism always doesn't mean appeasing the minorities,but look at the following flow of things-----1-babri masjid brought down,2-gujrat riots,3-pak brings up muslim discrimination and kash,4-bjp talks of ram rajya,5-bjp talks of bringing up ram mandir at the place of babri,6-pak once again wd get a chance to bring back those issues if bjp was elected,thankfully they are not.,what does thease suggest????.............................bout environmental problems due to the project--------this things sd be brougt upon by proffesionals,not the vishya hindu parishad,if asked this people won't be able to utter a word more,clearly they lack proper and complete knowledge on the issue................hindus in india don't have to give up their religion,they just have to be more clear minded bout where to bring in religion.
If India is going to be thinking only in terms of what others(particularly Paks) will say about our internal matters, then we are doomed for sure. Pak uses all kinds of excuses. They want us to believe that terrorism in India started with destruction of Babri structure, but that is not true. Nor is it true that Gujarat riots or Mumbai riots are the reason for increase in terrorism in India. ISI has created jihadi groups that cultivate youngsters(naive/misguided/dejected/rotten....etc) in the name of religion or by making them believe that their religion is under attack. This has absolutely nothing to do with anything BJP(or Congress, third front and Left) has done.
And for record, Pakistan has more sectarian violence than India. More muslims get killed in Pakistan than in India(though the number of Muslims is roughly the same). So, stop looking at our internal matters from Pak's point of view. It is your argument that is flawed. You are saying that Pak will be allowed to bring up our internal issues if BJP comes to power?!? Who comes to power is completely our internal issue and Pak cant do squat about it. Pak had military dictators coming to power and India dealt with them. Pak has taliban taking jiziya from its Sikh minorities. Pak has a record of Nuclear proliferation, Pak has been formenting terrorism in India from the land that it controls. Yet, India has dealt with them.
As for VHP, it is clear that you have no idea about them and further you look down upon them. But to assume that they are dim-witted thugs is not right. Dont have pressumptions about others without knowing all the facts. As a matter of fact, some of the ppl in VHP/RSS are PhDs, Lawyers......etc.
Mate, you are too concerned with what world(even Paks) will say. That is a wrong attitude(specially in a dog eat dog world). There are reports about possiblities of Pak's nukes getting into terrorists' hands. Has Pak lost anything due to it? Pak's aid got trebled! India's nukes are not in any danger. What have we gained? US want us to sign CTBT and NPT! Being a good boy has not earned us anything, nor will it do in future. We need to look out for interests and not for a pat on the back by the 'world'.btw,i still support india's stand on our nukes,atleast we dont have reports coming out every day questioning security and prolification,we had to show the world ,we have nukes ,and we did that in 1998,thats enough:bye.....thnx:mornin: