Krusty
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 2,529
- Likes
- 4,869
There is no difference between Shia and Sunni. Difference is only superficial. Both differ in their views on the prophets successor, which the Sunnis don't. That is all. Every Muslim is guided by the Sunnah. Shias also give importance to Muhammad's Son in law. And that for them, is worth spilling blood over. For all intents and purposes, both are absolutely the same as far as kafirs are concerned.i once took a peek inside a shia forum on a thread, where the members were discussing about shias v/s sunnis v/s kaafirs love-triangle. they were all unanimous in their observation that shias & sunnis are brothers afterall, & that its the kaafirs who're to be tackled as priority (first).
Yes peaceful for now compared to the majority. Because they are oppressed by the majority Shias and Sunnis. Nonetheless, left to their devices or upon reaching critical mass, will plot the quickest way to convert you if they can or dispose of you if it doesn't work. That is the whole point isn't it? If they can, they will but they can't so they are quiet. You make a fair point about the Yezidis though. Still that leaves the Balochis and Kurds. For me, as a rule, I do not trust Any Abrahamic. Religions and sects do not matter. Any religion that says, only we are Gods chosen people is bogus and if it says join us if you want to reach heaven, its outright dangerous.and they are? genuinely curious to know. are they far from (the influence of) qur'an or dont have presiding mullas? havent reached critical mass in their locations? in previous pages i had read the name of the Yezidis a few times, as a peaceful 'sect'. they though are said to have links/relations with the Indics of the yore in lineage (and Yezidis worldwide had congratulated Yogi Adityanath when he was appointed as the CM; not related, but just thought of sharing).
Last edited: