Rajaraja Chola
Regular Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Messages
- 761
- Likes
- 2,389
There is no need for HAL to design anything. Most of the stuffs have already been developed. Radars, Displays, EW suite etc. All HAL needs to do is integrate. For integration, engineers from BEL, DRDO labs, ADA will assist HAL if and when necessary.Design integration and validation is being done by ADA. Once approved and certified by ADA these changes will be implemented by HAL on actual aircraft. The project is not completed by ADA perspective.
I have confirmed this on ground. All design work w.r.t. to Tejas comes under the purview of ADA.
Yes, HAL has designed aircraft in past but a 4th generation aircraft is all together different ball game.
Another thing HAL doesn't own the source code for mission computer nor the simulation models to enable it to successfully integrate third party LRUs.
Second, after a project is done and transferred over to an manufacturer, the developer project is done. The source code will be handled by HAL engineers from now on. The end user IAF can't be running over to ADA for very very minor changes. HAL will be requested to handle that. Only if there is a major bug in the source code, will ADA come in. At the end of the day, IAF has an agreement with HAL and not ADA.
Who do you think is developing and integrating CATs warrior into Tejas? Who is developing SPORT model? And if Malaysia request an modification or integration, it's HAL it's supposed to do those changes. HAL can't send ADA engineers. At some point of time, all ownership will be transferred. We call it sign off. Means end of development and handing over. Mk1A is done from HAL money and it's their project.
ADA already has much projects in it's plate with it's development timeline either too slow or non existent funding. There is Mk2, Amca, tedbf already. Along with UCAV programmes.