Search results

Makes much more sense here . .

if u check Messiah's Post you'll notice an "edited" tag

and that to you is a verdict . . . ?? All his life he spoke even many times suffered for standing up for Indian Culture and its History . . .

What's AIM ?

To you . . .May be love to drag everyone in that camp . . . . . . . That to me is a centrist view !!

Since u quoted Wikipedia . . . I think u might have made just a cursory glance at the Article ^ perhaps you missed this part . . . So no he didin't think that British civilized us . . .actually quite the opposite

Its still Ramayana . . .

I am still talking Ramayana or rather my attempts at interpretation of it . . . and i also flirt with the idea that Hanuman and other 'Monkeys' might be people of Sino - Asian ethnicities . Outrageous ?? Not to me !

Nobody needs to take everything from anyone seriously . . . Every POV has its merits still . . .More or less I believe the Myth of Ramyana is rooted in History rather then simply the fantasies of some sage . Its not totally Pointless to try to interpolate myth with the Historical theories

Well yeah Aryan / Dravidian version is what i make of it when i combine his version with The Aryan Invasion Theory . . . He ofcourse he contended that Rama must have been a king of Persian Origins . . . and other as Natives/Aboriginals

Alright then . . . For the Record . . . It is not DMK's version . . . I never called Hanuman Dravid . . . It's the Nirad C Chaudhary version / Interpretation of events

That's it . . .!! I rest my case

I am not saying that it was NOT Lust . . . It could have been . . . I t as well may not have been . . .We dont know and More importantly Ram and Laxman had no right to punish her for harboring sexuaa desires;

As they Say the The Devil is in the Details . Your oversimplification of events suits your purpose to justify that the least amount of force these great gods could have used was to cut off the nose of a women that they deliberately enraged . In my version these two Aryans first humiliated...

The fact that u keep attacking me and not my messages . . . says all about sense . Let's stop this bullshit about Married man and Lustful lady Married man did get married again and again in this age with wild abandon as did Ram's Father her Lust here is not subject to the judgement of two...

I am sorry . . . it requires sense of humour outside my ability to explain

How funny these two posts coming from the same man :rofl:

Nothing but Wishful Interpretation to suit your Purpose IMO

well we would need reference to understand what exactly did this Rejection entail . . ? I seriously suspect saying that she was simply rejected might be ommiting relevant details

obviously u need more then hints . . . Your Logic that she's at fault because she desired a man already married has no value . . . Because we are talking of an age where Polygamy was norm . Now got the relevance of Dasharath ?