Why New Delhi wants to forget 1962?

JBH22

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,497
Likes
17,878
While the Indian National Congress is still able to remember the role of former prime ministers Lal Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi in the India-Pakistan conflicts of 1965 and 1971, it has forgotten the 1962 War with China.

'Congress and the Making of the Indian Nation', a souvenir released on the occasion of the 125th anniversary of the foundation of the party and edited by senior leader Pranab Mukherjee says that in 1971 Indira Gandhi "was hailed as Durga, an incarnation of Shakti." The events which saw the birth of Bangladesh are still considered to be 'her personal success'.

During the 1965 Indo-Pakistan War, Shastri had already demonstrated to the world that India could defend its territory with modest resources: "The aggression by Pakistan was effectively checked. The Indian troops even crossed over to Pakistani territory near Lahore", write Congress historians.

The 1962 conflict with China remains a deep scar on the Indian psyche, but the 172-page book entirely omits the episode. To many, it resembles a Stalinian way to write history.

This reflects a great deal on the level of the historians working for the Congress. Foremost is Mridula Mukherjee, the director of Nehru Memorial Museum & Library, an autonomous body under the Ministry of Culture who flouted all government rules, which prohibit the director of such bodies from associating with a particular political party. Interestingly, the release of the book came soon after another 'release': two letters sent by Jawaharlal Nehru to US President John F Kennedy on November 19, 1962.

Thanks to the truly eminent journalist Inder Malhotra these two missives are today in the public domain. Did the Indian National Congress know that the first prime minister of India informed the US President that the situation in November 1962 was 'desperate'? Nehru begged to the US to immediately despatch a 'more comprehensive' US military aid, "if the Chinese are to be prevented from taking over the whole of Eastern India." Till these letters were 'declassified' by the veteran journalist, there was only a brief mention about their existence in the "Foreign Relations of the United States" which mentions: "The letter conveyed in Telegram 1891 was the first of two letters sent by Nehru to Kennedy on November 19.

The second was delivered to the White House by the Indian Ambassador on the evening of November 19. These letters have not been declassified by the Indian government." The Office of the Historian of the US government quotes their summary published by S Gopal, Nehru's biographer: "Nehru, apparently without consulting any of his cabinet colleagues or officials, apart from the Foreign Secretary, M J Desai, wrote two letters to Kennedy describing the situation as 'really desperate' and asked for the immediate despatch of a minimum of twelve squadrons of supersonic all-weather fighters and the setting up of radar communications.

American personnel would have to man these fighters and installations and protect Indian cities from air attacks by the Chinese till Indian personnel had been trained. If possible, the United States should also send planes flown by American personnel to assist the Indian Air Force in any battles with the Chinese in Indian air space; but aerial action by India elsewhere would be the responsibility of the Indian Air Force. Nehru also asked for two B-47 bomber squadrons to enable India to strike at Chinese bases and air fields, but to learn to fly these planes Indian pilots and technicians would be sent immediately for training in the United States." Malhotra discovered by chance the unredacted letters: "Imagine my surprise, when soon after arriving in Washington this time around, I had easy access to these 'forbidden' epistles (in the JFK Library)."

Though there is no mention of it in The Making of the Indian Nation, in November 1962, India faced the most dramatic moment of its recent history. In the words of Nehru (to Kennedy): "The situation in NEFA (North-East Frontier Agency, today Arunachal Pradesh) Command has deteriorated still further. Bomdila has fallen and the retreating forces from Sela have been trapped between the Sela Ridge and Bomdila. A serious threat has developed to our Digboi oilfields in Assam.

With the advance of the Chinese in massive strength, the entire Brahmaputra Valley is seriously threatened and unless something is done immediately to stem the tide, the whole of Assam, Tripura, Manipur and Nagaland would also pass into Chinese hands." The prime minister not knowing that the Chinese were ready to declare a unilateral ceasefire (it was done three days later) informed the American President: "The Chinese have poised massive forces also in Chumbi Valley between Sikkim and Bhutan and another invasion from that direction appears imminent"¦ In Ladakh, as I have said in my earlier communication, Chushul is under heavy attack and the shelling of the airfield at Chushul has already commenced. We have also noticed increasing air activity by the Chinese air force."

In the first letter, Nehru had told Kennedy that after the fall of Chushul there was "nothing to stop the Chinese till they reach Leh, the headquarters of the Ladakh province of Kashmir." B K Nehru, the Indian ambassador, delivered the second letter to the White House at night. He later said that his first impulse was to not deliver it. Malhotra recounts: "(B K Nehru) never discussed the contents of the two letters with anyone but did tell me that he locked them up in the safe that only the ambassador could open." Though according to the official history of the Congress, it was Nehru who "outlined five principles of Panchsheel which became the basis of the Non-Aligned Movement", in November 1962, he badly panicked and aligned himself with Washington.

It has always surprised me why the government is adamant on not publishing the Henderson-Brooks report of the 1962 debacle.

Defence Minister A K Antony recently told Parliament that the report could not be made public because an internal study by the Indian Army had established that its contents "are not only extremely sensitive but are of current operational value." Is it not strange that a 47-year-old report is still of 'operational value'? The officials who drafted the minister's reply may not be aware that another report, the Official History of the Conflict with China (1962) was prepared by the History Division of the Ministry of Defence which details the famous 'operations' in 474 foolscap pages.

After the release of Congress and the Making of the Indian Nation, the motives of the government are clear. The party would like to forever erase the painful months of October/November 1962. Delhi has decided to forget about 1962 altogether.
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/IDR-Updates/Why-New-Delhi-wants-to-forget-1962.html

I always wondered agreed Congress wants to hide such debacle to avoid any political ramifications but why wasn't the Henderson Brooks report not declassified by BJP during their tenure.

:confused1:
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Right why didn't BJP do it?? May be there is some truth in Anthony's statement about the report still having some operational value.

But if the contents of the letter are analysed, 12 squads of fighters to be manned by US and then train indian pilots, 2 squads of bombers. Did Nehru think the war would last for years or what? May be Nehru was just using the war as a pretext to get into US camp and also get some war machines, may be as aid.
 

warriorextreme

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
1,867
Likes
3,040
Country flag
This war changed our military in good way..
military size increased,military equipments started coming in and most importantly nehru woke up from sweet dreams.
 

JBH22

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,497
Likes
17,878
This war changed our military in good way..
military size increased,military equipments started coming in and most importantly nehru woke up from sweet dreams.
But it shattered our post independence invincibility record and if i may so no lesson has been learned
 

captonjohn

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
580
Likes
278
Country flag
This war changed our military in good way..
military size increased,military equipments started coming in and most importantly nehru woke up from sweet dreams.
And gave our public and politician incurable fear from china and for whole this thing our politician were responsible.
 

warriorextreme

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
1,867
Likes
3,040
Country flag
And gave our public and politician incurable fear from china and for whole this thing our politician were responsible.
who fears china??
in 1962 we went off killing many chinese with 1:8 power ratio..we lost only due to their greater numbers...and of course stupid politicians back then were in sleep so the whole thing happened..
but that is why we have huge military today and trying to improve it day by so that we wont repeat same mistakes.
 

amitkriit

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
2,463
Likes
1,927
New Delhi wants to forget 1962 because the grandpa of our future king was responsible for the great debacle.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,263
Country flag
But it shattered our post independence invincibility record and if i may so no lesson has been learned
It is better to be defeated and be more alert and prepared next time than to live in a dreamy imaginary world of "invincibility". Think about it:

- We thrashed Pakistan in 48

- We thrashed Portugal in 61

After 2 victories, I think we could easily digest a reality-loaded punch from PLA.

who fears china??in 1962 we went off killing many chinese with 1:8 power ratio..we lost only due to their greater numbers...and of course stupid politicians back then were in sleep so the whole thing happened..but that is why we have huge military today and trying to improve it day by so that we wont repeat same mistakes.
We lost due to a HUGE set of factors mate:

1- overestimating PLAAF and not using IAF to cut off supplies
2- lack of modern automatic weaponry--we had WW2 weapons while Chinese had Soviet automated weapons
3- Political indeciveness of Nehru and gang.


New Delhi wants to forget 1962 because the grandpa of our future king was responsible for the great debacle.
King my ***. That Italian chihuahua is getting nowhere near the power throne. No matter what Madam Maino has in her mind. :cool:
 

S.A.T.A

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
2,569
Likes
1,560
There is a prevalent myth that It was Pt Nehru's pacifism that kept India unprepared and immobilized for a possible Himalayan contest with China,that the Chinese aggression was somehow a bolt from the blue for Nehru govt.India's lack of proper military preparedness for the 1962 incident was not so much due to Pt Nehru's penchant for pacifism,which was to a certain extent,but also due to his irrational fear of overt militarization.The experiences of the world war 2 and the INA somehow caused Nehru to view substantial militarization,which would have entailed recruitment and instilling martial pride,as tantamount to encouraging militant nationalism and hence Pt Nehru found ways for India to circumvent potential conflict with neighbors and eschew aggressive defense of Indian strategic frontiers.

This was the one of the primary reasons why Nehru was happy to give away Indian territories like the island of Kacchthivu off the coast of Tamil Nadu or the Kabaw Valley of Manipur ,or try establish an utterly naive entente with a belligerent China.Pt Nehru attempted every trick in diplomacy and national policy making,often at the cost of our strategic and sovereign interests,to avoid India having to develop military muscle to defend her strategic space.
 

JBH22

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,497
Likes
17,878
New Delhi wants to forget 1962 because the grandpa of our future king was responsible for the great debacle.
X2 that will be the saddest day if i see that creature in the country's top job he just doesn't deserve.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top