U.S. Troops Can Now Call in Tomahawk Cruise Missiles for Close Air Support

Discussion in 'Land Forces' started by Yusuf, Jul 26, 2015.

  1. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,287
    Location:
    BANGalore
    The U.S. military received its first Tomahawk cruise missile in 1983. And now 32 years later, American troops are still teaching the far-flying smart munition new tricks.

    In a test on Jan. 29, a team of U.S. Marines called in an upgraded Tomahawk, called a “Block IV,” to quickly strike a nearby target—just like the Marines routinely do with their artillery, Harrier attack jets and Cobra helicopter gunships.

    This is not what the Tomahawk normally does. By applying new software and procedures, the Marines have transformed the super-accurate missile with its 1,000-pound warhead into a close-support weapon—one they can dial up to blast the enemy during, say, fast-moving street-to-street fighting on some urban battlefield.

    Meanwhile, the Navy is teaching the land-attack Tomahawk to also be an anti-ship missile.

    This is a big, big deal. The U.S. military is getting powerful new weapons … without actually buying much new hardware.


    The Pentagon keeps thousands of the million-dollar-apiece Tomahawks in stock—the precise number is classified. Mainly, the Navy launches them from submarines and surface ships to punch holes in enemy air defenses at the start of bombing campaigns. After all, there’s no pilot on board, so it’s no big deal if some of the Tomahawks get shot down.

    Most recently, barrages of sea-launched Tomahawks opened up the air wars in Libya in 2011 and Syria in 2014.

    Traditionally, the cruise missile motors at low altitude, propelled by its turbofan engine over a distance of up to 1,000 miles. The early-model Tomahawks are “fire-and-forget” weapons that follow a pre-planned path, scanning the terrain below and comparing it to digital maps they keep stored in their memory to keep track of where they are.


    Above—the cruiser USS Shiloh launches a Tomahawk at a target in Iraq in 1996. Navy photo. At top—a Block IV Tomahawk an instant away from striking a drone ship target on Jan. 27. Raytheon photo
    More recent versions of the Tomahawk can also home in on GPS coordinates. But for the missile’s first two decades, it was a pretty inflexible weapon. You had to plot its course days in advance. And once you pressed the launch button, the missile was beyond your control.

    That began to change in the early 2000s, when the Navy started buying the easier-to-use Block IV edition of the missile from Raytheon. The Block IV has the ability to communicate with its launch vessel while in the air.

    That means a ship’s crew can switch a Tomahawk’s target in mid-flight—or even launch a Tomahawk and tell it to fly in circles for a few hours near enemy territory, waiting to strike until someone spots a specific target and feeds the location to the missile.

    The new-and-improved Block IV Tomahawk has inspired a lot of innovation. In 2011, the Navy and Air Force collaborated on a startling experiment over the China Lake bombing range in California. The Navy lobbed a Tomahawk into the air and an Air Force F-22 stealth fighter relayed data to the missile to guide the munition to its target.

    And at China Lake on Jan. 27 this year, the Navy tested out the Block IV’s ability to hit a moving ship at sea.
    The sailing branch maintained a few anti-ship Tomahawks back in the 1980s but got rid of them when it determined that it possessed no reliable way of steering the missiles many hundreds of miles to strike an enemy warship that’s constantly moving.

    Instead, the Navy made do with short-range Harpoon anti-ship missiles—until the January test proved the latest Tomahawk could finally do the job of sinking a vessel.

    The destroyer USS Kidd launched a Block IV Tomahawk. A Navy F/A-18E Super Hornet fighter spotted a drone target vessel and beamed the coordinates to a ground station, which then passed them to the cruise missile—all in near real time.

    The Tomahawk smashed into the drone ship. “This demonstration is the first step toward evolving Tomahawk with improved network capability and extends its reach from fixed and mobile to moving targets,” Raytheon boasted in a press release.

    Bob Work, the deputy secretary of defense, labelled the test Tomahawk “a 1,000-mile anti-ship cruise missile” and declared it “potentially a game-changing capability for not a lot of cost.”

    Buy ‘The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World.’
    And the experimentation continued. Two days after the anti-ship test, Marines on San Nicolas Island off the coast of Southern California radioed the destroyer Kidd with the coordinates of a mock enemy position. Kidd responded by quickly firing a Tomahawk, taking advantage of the Block IV missile’s streamlined launch procedure.

    “Using GPS navigational updates, the missile performed a vertical dive to impact on San Nicolas Island, scoring a direct hit on the target designated by the Marines,” Raytheon announced.

    Now imagine combining all the Block IV’s new skills. Before a battle, the Navy could fire a bunch of the missiles into the air. They loiter until the ground troops get into trouble. The troops send GPS coordinates to any missiles hanging out nearby.

    After just a few minutes, Tomahawks slam into the enemy forces—even if the bad guys are already on the move. The American troops sustain the assault, quickly ordering up additional Tomahawks until the enemy gives in.

    It’s on-call, fast-reacting, robotic close air support. And unprecedented.

    Three decades after the Tomahawk’s debut, Pentagon is still buying fresh copies of the drone munition—and could continue doing so for many years. Who know what other new tricks the old cruise missile might learn.

    https://medium.com/war-is-boring/u-...e-missiles-for-close-air-support-2a8aa4a64428
     
    LETHALFORCE likes this.
  2.  
  3. apple

    apple Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    171
    Somewhat strange development. Know Javelin anti-tank missiles, which India was meant to be buying, have mainly been used for take out bunkers, etc... Similiar to how M72 LAWs have been used been used.

    So yeah, maybe this is going to happen. Although the article doesn't explain what would happen if a target doesn't appear before the missile runs out of fuel, which I why i suspect drones+ hellfires (or whatever) is going to be the way forward.
     
  4. Adioz

    Adioz Irregular member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2015
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Oppai, Tengoku
    Can the Indian Nirbhay missile be modified to do something like this? It already has loiter capability.
    It would provide a good Close air support capability to para forces.
     
    LETHALFORCE likes this.
  5. ezsasa

    ezsasa Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,528
    Likes Received:
    3,051
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
    Technology shouldn't be an issue, but cost is.

    Either way cruise missiles are not part of our tactical battle plans yet.
     
  6. Adioz

    Adioz Irregular member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2015
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Oppai, Tengoku
    That is why it should only be used as an option for special missions and hence should be an asset at the corps level.

    But they should be a part, or what is the point of all those Brahmos, Shaurya, Nirbhay, Prahar, etc.
     
  7. ezsasa

    ezsasa Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,528
    Likes Received:
    3,051
    Location:
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
    All strategic missile are tools, what your are talking about is "Method of usage".

    15 years from now, pretty sure your dream will be a reality based on threat perception. Let Nirbhay get operationalised first, then we can talk about next stages.
     
    Adioz likes this.

Share This Page