Rohingya refugee crisis

[Vijyes]

A military alliance that would only be involved in muslim countries and only when asked so. All musmlim countries making noises about plight of Rohingyas but none are coming to help. Pakistan has refused to give citizenship to some 400k-500k rohingyas living there for decades. That's really one great pseudo-Islamic Ummah.

And what involvement is that? That is the ummah army. They won't take muslim refugees as that will mean there will be fewer refugees to send to other countries

 

[Villager]

because its a big *kabeela* with all the kabeelaayi tendencies & characteristics. our immediate western neighbour is a saakshaat manifestation of that kabeela in all its mortal form.

BTW, increase in no. of muslims equates to increase in the demographic sway held by islam. measurement of a religion's expanse is a factor of the no. of its adherents, & since muslims are (only) those who believe or are led to believe that there is only one god 'allah', & mohd was his last messenger, the no.s of such people would determine the extent of influence of the religion. they do believe what they say IMO. those who dont, are not muslims technically & have to defect to dar-ul-harb countries to save their lives.

Agreed in parts ,............................

 

[Villager]

And what involvement is that? That is the ummah army. They won't take muslim refugees as that will mean there will be fewer refugees to send to other countries

Lost electricity, battery is down, and also the thread going off topic, will reply later. Going out for a walk.

 

[Indian Sniper.001]

A military alliance that would only be involved in muslim countries and only when asked so. All musmlim countries making noises about plight of Rohingyas but none are coming to help. Pakistan has refused to give citizenship to some 400k-500k rohingyas living there for decades. That's really one great pseudo-Islamic Ummah.

They are not accepting refugees just because they can fund wahhabism in another country which is not an Islamic one, or an Islamic country which as of now is not supporting its cause (Bangla) for instance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let Europe eats its own pile of shit (liberalism). They are gonna drown in it. Infact, they are already drowning in it. In another 2-3 years, Islamophobia will double/triple than presently, and there is nothing they can do about it.

 

[Vijyes]

A military alliance that would only be involved in muslim countries and only when asked so. All musmlim countries making noises about plight of Rohingyas but none are coming to help. Pakistan has refused to give citizenship to some 400k-500k rohingyas living there for decades. That's really one great pseudo-Islamic Ummah.

The point about islam one should not forget is that the core duty is jihad - sacrifice for islam. The plight of Rohingya is jihad, not suffering. Rohingya want to fight risking their lives for islam. Islam has more value than lives for them.

Now, pakistan or Saudis don't take in Rohingya so as to compel other countries to take them in for jihad. The long term aim of spreading islam overshadows the short term suffering if Rohingya. The suffering of Rohingya is merely an act of jihad.


Next, the ummah army has not yet begun its operations directly. It was just a few months back that Raheel Sharif got appointed as the chief. Give them 5-10 years of time to prepare, equip and raise battalion across infantry, navy and air force. All armies work within a country except for NATO and Russian army.

 

[Prayash]

Muslims are community of people. Islam is the religion. Muslims are growing the fatest and in numbers only, Islam isn't. Don't be too concerned.

just a small error,i know man that followers of islam are called muslims!
But my point was hindus in rohingya were killed because they were hindu!very depressing news,dont think muslims in india are better(i dont mean all of the muslims of india)read this,all verified news not fake.
Man Killed by Muslim Neighbour Over Tazia Donation; Indian Express Reports As “Joke Gone Awry”
http://www.hindupost.in/news/man-ki...nation-indian-express-reports-joke-gone-awry/
7 Muslim Youth Arrested in Uttarakhand for Sending Obscene Facebook Comments to Girls
http://www.hindupost.in/news/7-musl...hand-sending-obscene-facebook-comments-girls/
Hindu Man Lynched Over Minor Altercation In Pune, Dies After Being Pushed Under Truck-*killed by a muslim
http://www.hindupost.in/news/hindu-man-lynched-minor-altercation-pune-dies-pushed-truck/
Attack by Muslim Neighbours Leaves Son Dead, Mother Injured in Kuppam, AP
http://www.hindupost.in/news/attack-muslim-neighbours-leaves-son-dead-mother-injured-kuppam-ap/
and many are there in this site:www.hindupost.in
So every hindu should be concerned about these violent muslims

@Vijyes do visit this site it is doing a great job:biggrin2:

 

[Prayash]

Rohingya refugees are common people, not terrorists, says Mamata Banerjee
INDRAJIT KUNDU | KOLKATA | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
Opposing Centre's view on Rohingya refugees crisis, Mamata tweeted that all commoners are not terrorists and has called for the need to support the community.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Central government is planning to deport 40,000 Rohingya refugees.
• Mamata Banerjee on Friday called for the need to support the community.
• She also said that all commoners are not terrorists.

With the Narendra Modi-led central government planning to deport 40,000 Rohingya refugees, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Friday called for the need to support the community.

Speaking out on the issue for the first time, Banerjee wrote on Twitter, " We do support the United Nations appeal to help the Rohingya people."Banerjee's appeal for helping the Rohingyas come at a time when the Ministry of Home Affairs has alerted states to identify and monitor "illegal migrants ".

"Infiltration from Rakhine state of Myanmar into Indian territory, especially in the recent years besides being burden on the limited resources of the country also aggravate the security challenges posed to the country," the MHA advisory, dated August 8 stated.

Opposing the Centre's view on the matter , Mamata tweeted, "We believe that all commoners are not terrorists. We are really concerned."

Last month, the West Bengal government had announced that it would distribute identity cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to Rohingya children lodged in juvenile justice homes across the state after UNHCR officials in India wrote to the West Bengal government.

According to available data till August 2015, 83 Rohingyas, including women and children, are lodged in West Bengal prisons.

On Tuesday, thousands of protesters belonging to several Muslim organisations had rallied in Kolkata opposing PM Modi's deportation plan and demanding shelter for Rohingya refugees in India.

Protesters had questioned the Central government's move to welcome Hindu refugees from Bangladesh, and discriminate against Muslim refugees from Myanmar.

 

[F-14B]

Rohingya refugees are common people, not terrorists, says Mamata Banerjee
INDRAJIT KUNDU | KOLKATA | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
Opposing Centre's view on Rohingya refugees crisis, Mamata tweeted that all commoners are not terrorists and has called for the need to support the community.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Central government is planning to deport 40,000 Rohingya refugees.
• Mamata Banerjee on Friday called for the need to support the community.
• She also said that all commoners are not terrorists.

With the Narendra Modi-led central government planning to deport 40,000 Rohingya refugees, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Friday called for the need to support the community.

Speaking out on the issue for the first time, Banerjee wrote on Twitter, " We do support the United Nations appeal to help the Rohingya people."Banerjee's appeal for helping the Rohingyas come at a time when the Ministry of Home Affairs has alerted states to identify and monitor "illegal migrants ".

"Infiltration from Rakhine state of Myanmar into Indian territory, especially in the recent years besides being burden on the limited resources of the country also aggravate the security challenges posed to the country," the MHA advisory, dated August 8 stated.

Opposing the Centre's view on the matter , Mamata tweeted, "We believe that all commoners are not terrorists. We are really concerned."

Last month, the West Bengal government had announced that it would distribute identity cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to Rohingya children lodged in juvenile justice homes across the state after UNHCR officials in India wrote to the West Bengal government.

According to available data till August 2015, 83 Rohingyas, including women and children, are lodged in West Bengal prisons.

On Tuesday, thousands of protesters belonging to several Muslim organisations had rallied in Kolkata opposing PM Modi's deportation plan and demanding shelter for Rohingya refugees in India.

Protesters had questioned the Central government's move to welcome Hindu refugees from Bangladesh, and discriminate against Muslim refugees from Myanmar.

Who needs an enemy when you have friends like her

 

[Vijyes]

Bengalis who vote Mamata are criminals and need to be destroyed. Tolerating people even though they behave completely whimsically is absurd.

 

[rock127]

They were blaming India for not keeping refugees, and today morning in the news I read about london metro and they got the reason why India is not keeping refugees. India has already suffered enough terrorism.
Now they will keep shut and will nor force India for this.

This is the condition of Europeans...turned into total pussies!

Just another day in Europe and that after high alert!

Man shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ attacks two women with hammer in France

I forgot to mention ISLAMIC MILITARY ALLIANCE. 40 countries are members and few more countries like Indonesia etc have applied for membership which is pending. Pakistan has given nukes to Saudi and Saudi keeps funding pakistan in missile and nuclear advances.
Who said they are not united?

That Sunni "alliance" is a joke.It's founder is Saudis and Commander is Paki Raheel Sharif(Sunnis) and Iran(Shia) is not a member so it explains the "alliance".Who are they going to fight? Do they produce weapons for their own? US wont allow such alliance and make infighting which is already there.

Who needs an enemy when you have friends like her

She is a enemy within and NOT a friend.She is a bloody anti-national low life convert.

Bengalis who vote Mamata are criminals and need to be destroyed. Tolerating people even though they behave completely whimsically is absurd.

Thats a shame... Bengal used to be known for Bose,Tagore etc and now it's a pity where Bengalis have taken their state to.Bengal is a gone case now since after muslim grow over 20% they take over like cockroaches on the land and divide it.Bengalis would soon start migrating in other part of India and WB would be a Islamic state sooner or later.Hindus NEVER learn!

 

[Screambowl]

Probably idea is alter vote share in Bangladesh elections.

And who would most probably be behind this? And you are saying that the real motive to have something done in Burma is to have a result in Bangladesh?

 

[Vijyes]

This is the condition of Europeans...turned into total pussies!

Just another day in Europe and that after high alert!

Man shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ attacks two women with hammer in France

View attachment 20166



That Sunni "alliance" is a joke.It's founder is Saudis and Commander is Paki Raheel Sharif(Sunnis) and Iran(Shia) is not a member so it explains the "alliance".Who are they going to fight? Do they produce weapons for their own? US wont allow such alliance and make infighting which is already there.

Who are they going to fight? What do you think they are doing in Europe, Myanmar etc? USA did not allow that but their oil power is too much for others to handle.

If you remember, USA tried to bring Arab Spring but failed miserably as Saudis and Pakistanis intervened either directly as in Bahrain or indirectly as in Egypt (Muslim Brotherhood), Tunisia (Jasmine revolution), Syria (ISIS) to combat the "moderate rebels" of the USA. USA was left helpless as they could not wage a direct war and the indirect proxy war they tried only ended up in extremely radical regimes which were worse than the original ones. They even tried to kick out Erdogan which also failed as the people came running on the streets in support of Erdogan!

They do produce some of their own weapons and are building infrastructure for that. But, after knowing this, the west or even China has reduced supply of technology to these countries. However, they are forced to sell billions of dollars worth weapons to the Arabs as a payment for the oil, to meet the import expenses via an export. Turkey, for example, has submarine construction ability, pakistan has nukes, ballistic and cruise missile technology. Turkey, Pakistan and indonesia are building 5th generation planes, at least on paper.

The biggest weapon for them is population which they are pushing into other countries to act as major source of firepower within the opponents just like a trojan horse. The mosques are spying units just like the catholic church and a great supplier of human intelligence (Just google on how catholic church acted as a spying institution).

 

[Vijyes]

And who would most probably be behind this? And you are saying that the real motive to have something done in Burma is to have a result in Bangladesh?

The real reason is not to alter vote share but to radicalise muslims in Burma for better equipped soldiers for the future and to keep the spirit of jihad alive.

All the countries kept quiet fearing oil sanctions from Arabs but Burma wouldn't take any of it and cracked down heavily. Myanmar is a major supplier (exporter) of gas and consumes a measly 60000 barrels of oil a day with 30% internally produced. So, India and China helped Myanmar by supplying the rerouted refined oil products.

 

[Screambowl]

The real reason is not to alter vote share but to radicalise muslims in Burma for better equipped soldiers for the future and to keep the spirit of jihad alive.

After India's intervention in B'desh the Sheikh Hasina cracked down on these outfits.
Now after this Burma thing, who is getting the most benefit of such insurgency? That's my question.

I believe it's Bangladesh which is benefitted, but there are more contenders because B'desh's economy is not that well that they will be able to take part.

Not to forget as you mentioned, Burma is rich in natural gas.

Where as @ezsasa mentioned about some report and such unrest began within hours?

God help India.

 

[Vijyes]

After India's intervention in B'desh the Sheikh Hasina cracked down on these outfits.
Now after this Burma thing, who is getting the most benefit of such insurgency? That's my question.

I believe it's Bangladesh which is benefitted, but there are more contenders because B'desh's economy is not that well that they will be able to take part.

Not to forget as you mentioned, Burma is rich in natural gas.

Where as @ezsasa mentioned about some report and such unrest began within hours?

God help India.

Sheikh Hasina is no better. She is not controlling influx of bangladeshis into India nor is she controlling fake currency. Hasina was PM since 2008 and she did something only after Modi intervened and that may be because of fear of Modi taking action like pushing back bangladeshis - about 1 crore muslims back to Bangladesh etc. Hasina is not a friend. Bangladesh is not a friend. Bangladesh intelligence agencies have lot of jihadi network affiliation.

This crackdown was spontaneous and not well planned. The jihadis expected Myanmar to it back and do only minimal action like in Europe but Myanmar was a tough nut to crack. Myanmar didn't budge an inch and just attacked back. So, since it is not a planned action, no one is to benefit except Myanmar which has got rid of jihadis to a good extent.

India not having oil is the biggest drawback. In addition, retarded ancestors who did not fight but squirmed like pigs following Gandhi were the ones who exacerbated this problem

 

[ezsasa]

And who would most probably be behind this? And you are saying that the real motive to have something done in Burma is to have a result in Bangladesh?

As we know there are two begums in bangladesh.
One is secular and the other has full support from jamaatis.
jamaatis are pissed off with sheikh hasina ever since the crackdown post Dhaka bakery attack began.

It's not like jamaatis haven't done this demographic change before, it's already been done in WB and Assam.
And also when burmese military crackdown began, why did everyone move towards bangladesh? There are two other directions they could have moved to. North and east of rakhine.

If you listen to the statements given by rohingyas to TV cameras, all are repeating same three lines. even rohingyas living in delhi are repeating the same three lines.

if you look at Cox bazaar video from BBC, refugees have already built a mini town on a hill all by themselves. They even built themselves a stairway on the hill side to go up.

Basically my point is that everything is too well organised, rather than a response to a calamity.

My logic of planned exodus also fits with global muslim refugee story of europe.

This is just a theory. only future will tell.

 

[Vijyes]

As we know there are two begums in bangladesh.
One is secular and the other has full support from jamaatis.
jamaatis are pissed off with sheikh hasina ever since the crackdown post Dhaka bakery attack began.

It's not like jamaatis haven't done this demographic change before, it's already been done in WB and Assam.
And also when burmese military crackdown began, why did everyone move towards bangladesh? There are two other directions they could have moved to. North and east of rakhine.

If you listen to the statements given by rohingyas to TV cameras, all are repeating same three lines. even rohingyas living in delhi are repeating the same three lines.

if you look at Cox bazaar video from BBC, refugees have already built a mini town on a hill all by themselves. They even built themselves a stairway on the hill side to go up.

Basically my point is that everything is too well organised, rather than a response to a calamity.

My logic of planned exodus also fits with global muslim refugee story of europe.

This is just a theory. only future will tell.

Bangladesh already has muslim majority and Hasina was about to lose elections in 2013. She banned the opposition party from contesting elections and won the elections where the vote share was about 25%. Peole too had apparently supported the opposition's boycott call. I don't think extra illegal Rohingyas would change anything

 

[Screambowl]

why did everyone move towards bangladesh? There are two other directions they could have moved to. North and east of rakhine.

Basically my point is that everything is too well organised, rather than a response to a calamity.

My logic of planned exodus also fits with global muslim refugee story of europe.

They even moved towards India, so they consider that that in India it will be easy to stay and sickulars would fight their case? That's a vote bank politics.
Sambit Patra made a valid point today on Znews by saying that, one side you blame Pakistan for harbouring threat elements, other side the opposition in India wants the same threat elements to be refugee just because of muslim vote factor. This will weaken India's policy on terrorism.

I don't think extra illegal Rohingyas would change anything

But these extra rohingyas are supported by sheikh hasina or khalida zia as per your assessment?

 

[Vijyes]

They even moved towards India, so they consider that that in India it will be easy to stay and sickulars would fight their case? That's a vote bank politics.
Sambit Patra made a valid point today on Znews by saying that, one side you blame Pakistan for harbouring threat elements, other side the opposition in India wants the same threat elements to be refugee just because of muslim vote factor. This will weaken India's policy on terrorism.


But these extra rohingyas are supported by sheikh hasina or khalida zia as per your assessment?

Not everything is about Hasina or Zia. Both are part if Islamic military alliance. There is merely political differences and not cultural. Hasina has joined IMA too. So, this Rohingya, Europe issue is the game of IMA including bangladesh. Muslims want to conquer the world using oil power and oil scarcity as a tool

 

[Vijyes]

They even moved towards India, so they consider that that in India it will be easy to stay and sickulars would fight their case? That's a vote bank politics.
Sambit Patra made a valid point today on Znews by saying that, one side you blame Pakistan for harbouring threat elements, other side the opposition in India wants the same threat elements to be refugee just because of muslim vote factor. This will weaken India's policy on terrorism.


But these extra rohingyas are supported by sheikh hasina or khalida zia as per your assessment?

Not everything is about Hasina or Zia. Both are part if Islamic military alliance. There is merely political differences and not cultural. Hasina has joined IMA too. So, this Rohingya, Europe issue is the game of IMA including bangladesh. Muslims want to conquer the world using oil power and oil scarcity as a tool.

Hasina is not innocent. She is just practical. Muslims are evil in general. A good Muslim is a traitor Muslim.