Pakistan succesfully test fires Hatf v-Ghauri Missile

Status
Not open for further replies.

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
another angle




How come they have almost same height :shocked:
We need to ask NK for the specification not pak to know about the paint job...:rofl:
This kind of analysis falls into the same category as the brilliant analysis of the success or failure of a missile test along with determining the manufacturer of the missile by viewing a video snippet showing the faces of the people at the test site.

Please see data below from the site link provided by Lurkerbaba:

Hatf 5 (Ghauri)
Country: Pakistan
Associated Country: Iran, People's Republic of China, North Korea
Alternate Name: Ghauri 1/Mark III
Class: MRBM
Basing: Road Mobile
Length: 15.90 m
Diameter: 1.35 m

Launch Weight: 15850 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 1200 kg
Warhead: Nuclear 15 to 35 kT, chemical, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Single-stage liquid
Range: 1300 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1998

Hatf 4 (Shaheen I)
Country: Pakistan
Alternate Name: Shaheen 1/Tarmuk
Class: SRBM
Basing: Road mobile
Length: 12.00 m
Diameter: 1.00 m

Launch Weight: 9500 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 700 kg
Warhead: 750 kg; Nuclear 35 kT, chemical, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Single-stage solid
Range: 750 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1999


Please also keep in mind that the two missiles (Ghauri vs Shaheen) use different types of fuel and therefore you cannot do a direct apples to apples comparison between them.
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
OFFTOPIC

Shaheen is claimed to be modeled after US- Pershing missile but the specs are very different?
I believe Shaheen I is suspected to be a derivative of the Chinese M-9 missile (the specs do not match the M-9 exactly either).
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
This kind of analysis falls into the same category as the brilliant analysis of the success or failure of a missile test along with determining the manufacturer of the missile by viewing a video snippet showing the faces of the people at the test site.
It appears that asking questions is not habit in your country. Still from the looks of it your engineers are not at all happy with the test, their body language say so. If you are happy with it be my guest. We are not at all concern about your missile test. We have already intercepted such type of rockets.
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
It appears that asking questions is not habit in your country. Still from the looks of it your engineers are not at all happy with the test, their body language say so. If you are happy with it be my guest. We are not at all concern about your missile test. We have already intercepted such type of rockets.
I have no issue with questions being asked, but surely you agree that using out of context imagery and video to come up with conclusions, such as the ones mentioned in my previous post, is not the most appropriate means of analysis.
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
I have no issue with questions being asked, but surely you agree that using out of context imagery and video to come up with conclusions, such as the ones mentioned in my previous post, is not the most appropriate means of analysis.
point was that persons who are supposed to make it, even after successful test are in very defensive and had sad look on their face.

here is pic after A5 launch



now look at engineers from previous launch



looks like they are attending funeral.
Ofcourse you can say that they are so stressed out that they want to go home and are happy in heart.
 

lcatejas

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
710
Likes
256
This kind of analysis falls into the same category as the brilliant analysis of the success or failure of a missile test along with determining the manufacturer of the missile by viewing a video snippet showing the faces of the people at the test site.

Please see data below from the site link provided by Lurkerbaba:

Hatf 5 (Ghauri)
Country: Pakistan
Associated Country: Iran, People's Republic of China, North Korea
Alternate Name: Ghauri 1/Mark III
Class: MRBM
Basing: Road Mobile
Length: 15.90 m
Diameter: 1.35 m

Launch Weight: 15850 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 1200 kg
Warhead: Nuclear 15 to 35 kT, chemical, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Single-stage liquid
Range: 1300 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1998

Hatf 4 (Shaheen I)
Country: Pakistan
Alternate Name: Shaheen 1/Tarmuk
Class: SRBM
Basing: Road mobile
Length: 12.00 m
Diameter: 1.00 m

Launch Weight: 9500 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 700 kg
Warhead: 750 kg; Nuclear 35 kT, chemical, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Single-stage solid
Range: 750 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1999


Please also keep in mind that the two missiles (Ghauri vs Shaheen) use different types of fuel and therefore you cannot do a direct apples to apples comparison between them.
Ok ! so what's the specification of Paint JOB....How log it took to paint these imported missiles...:laugh:
 

Virendra

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
4,697
Likes
3,041
Country flag
When does Pakistan plan to phase out these liquid propellants and have solid fuel missiles?
Their taller than mountain friends are on it.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
work on ghauri 3 as well production of liquid fuel missile is stopped

training related test as the news says
 

Agnostic Muslim

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
517
Likes
144
Last edited by a moderator:

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
@Agnostic Muslim

Blackwater is Someone you don't debate with when it comes to Pakistan. He is the expert. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211

Apollyon

Führer
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Messages
3,134
Likes
4,573
Country flag
'Mysterious metal objects' in Dadu fell from Hatf V missile: ISPR




KARACHI: The mysterious metallic objects, which fell from the sky baffling villagers in Dadu late Wednesday night, were parts of Pakistan's Hatf V Ghauri missile, a spokesman for the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said on Friday.

"The metal parts found in a remote area of Dadu, as reported in media today, were part of the motor body, which separated from the missile as planned, well within the safety corridor," said a statement by the ISPR.
~~~~~~~~~
The biggest fragment weighing 187 kilograms:shocked: fell on a ground in Allah Jurio Lund village, 30 kilometres from Dadu. Other pieces fell on Pir Mashaikh, Shehak Rodnani and Khandhani villages.

'Mysterious metal objects' in Dadu fell from Hatf V missile: ISPR | DAWN.COM
Pakistan should sue North Korea for faulty Missile :lawl:
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
'Mysterious metal objects' in Dadu fell from Hatf V missile: ISPR


KARACHI: The mysterious metallic objects, which fell from the sky baffling villagers in Dadu late Wednesday night, were parts of Pakistan's Hatf V Ghauri missile, a spokesman for the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said on Friday.

"The metal parts found in a remote area of Dadu, as reported in media today, were part of the motor body, which separated from the missile as planned, well within the safety corridor," said a statement by the ISPR.
~~~~~~~~~
The biggest fragment weighing 187 kilograms fell on a ground in Allah Jurio Lund village, 30 kilometres from Dadu. Other pieces fell on Pir Mashaikh, Shehak Rodnani and Khandhani villages.

'Mysterious metal objects' in Dadu fell from Hatf V missile: ISPR | DAWN.COM



Pakistan should sue North Korea for faulty Missile :lawl:
What????????
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
ARACHI: The mysterious metallic objects, which fell from the sky baffling villagers in Dadu late Wednesday night, were parts of Pakistan's Hatf V Ghauri missile, a spokesman for the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said on Friday.

"The metal parts found in a remote area of Dadu, as reported in media today, were part of the motor body, which separated from the missile as planned, well within the safety corridor," said a statement by the ISPR.
~~~~~~~~~
The biggest fragment weighing 187 kilograms fell on a ground in Allah Jurio Lund village, 30 kilometres from Dadu. Other pieces fell on Pir Mashaikh, Shehak Rodnani and Khandhani villages.


:taunt::taunt::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
@Agnostic Muslim,

Best intel available and coming from the Americans who lot more says Pak yield is 10kt range.

This represents very old design warheads.

Satellites, spy planes with intel gathering equipment after Pak test says a lot.

And tactical nuke threat of Pak is really :facepalm:

Seriously what can be mounted on the Nasr? And what cannot be achieved by conventional weapons for the same result?
What I have seen is that Pakistan thinks that nukes are a super guarantee. For every threat the answer is a nuke.

Let me throw in a scenario, let's assume Pak is way ahead and has 200 bombs. India makes a massive thrust as per cold start. 8 IBGs. Multiple front thrust. How many Nasr with tactical nukes will you fire to stop the advance?

Guess what, Indian soldiers are preparing/prepared for NBC. You just wasted a few tens of nukes. It makes many indian cities a lot safer as that many nukes less that Pak can throw on our cities. And best of all India will finish off all major Pakistani population centers.

The more Pak thinks it can secure itself with nukes, the worse off it is gong to get. Add to this the massive expense to make and keep secure the nukes.

If the Indian govt goes for the plan I have been recommending for upping the stakes, it will totally finish Pak economically that even the aid money that they divert will not be enough.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top