Discussion in 'Americas' started by Austin, Jun 29, 2013.
India not willing to play by the rules: US lawmakers
Is this the standard of Congressional hearing ?
I thought only in Indian parliamentary debate one can find some amount of absurdity.
How being a friend of USA you cannot have independent policy? what kind of analogy is that?
If Indian rules infringes IP rights of some US companies there is mechanism to address it, use them.
And, if your blood boils over it, then it's going to to give to hypertension but no solution.
And simply put, India is not USA's son of the later the father of India.
This message doesn't need to be delivered to you by your great-grandfather in your dreams.
From the same hearing
US solar industry urges India to remove trade barriers
Seeking a sizeable pie in India's fast emerging solar energy market, the American solar industry has asked it to remove the trade barriers which discriminates against US solar exports.
Testifying before a Congressional committee, Solar Energy Industry Association vice president John Smirnow alleged that India's local content requirement "discriminates against US solar exports and, thereby, provides an unfair competitive advantage to India's domestic solar manufacturers."
With some of the best solar resources in the world and the cost of solar continuing to decline, India's solar sector is poised for explosive growth, providing an important export opportunity for US solar manufacturers, he told lawmakers.
However, India's growing use of an industrial policy which discriminates against US solar exports, thereby providing an unfair competitive advantage to India's domestic solar manufacturers, Smirnow said yesterday during the Congressional hearing on "A Tangle of Trade Barriers: How India's Industrial Policy is Hurting US Companies" convened by the Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
While local content requirements may provide some protection for domestic manufacturers, they also stifle innovation, limit a country's access to next-generation technologies and increase costs, not to mention the fact that local content requirements are explicitly prohibited by global trading rules, he explained.
"Returning to the specifics of India's solar industrial policy, the national solar mission is divided into three phases. Under the first traunch of phase one, India required that eligible products - projects based on crystalline silicon technology - that's the other half of the solar panel industry - versus thin film," he said.
"That is where the US has a technological advantage - in this first phase India required that one half meet a local content requirement for cells, and solar cells are the heart of a solar panel for this technology," Smirnow said.
"So while US companies could sell cells into India or they could sell modules but they weren't able to sell cells, US-origin panels were thus barred from competing. For the second traunch of phase one, India broadened this local content requirement to mandate that national solar mission products use only crystalline silicon cells and panels manufactured in India, a significant lost opportunity for US exports," he alleged.
Looking forward, the US solar industry is concerned that India will expand its local content requirement yet again to cover thin film technology, effectively targeting hundreds of millions of dollars of US exports. "Our only hope is that the US government's recent decision to initiate a WTO case against India will eventually cause India to reverse course," he said.
"The US-India dispute follows on the heels of a recent WTO finding that Ontario, Canada's local content requirement for solar goods, substantially similar to India's, violated Canada's WTO obligations. In response, Canada has indicated that the solar program will be brought into compliance with the WTO decision, which we presume means that Canada will remove the local content provision," he said.
Smirnow said India should follow Canada's lead and remove the local content provision from its national solar mission.
US solar industry urges India to remove trade barriers - The New Indian Express
All three raving on India are Republicans. Fact is we cannot let 300,000 Indians die because US courts finds an "isomer" to be a genuine innovation.
So much of humanity to sell their products
how is it that china , not being a wto member gets away with much more than india
perhaps that's where we should focus for a solution ?
we might want to re- negotiatie certain aspects of our wto membership or "friendship " with the usa -
to put ourselves in chinas' more privileged position
"As a nation, we should handle India like my dad did when I was growing up and I made his blood boil: He put his arm around me and or pulled me where he would go, to make sure his fingers were resting firmly on my shoulder just to inflict some pain if I diverted from the course we would go down. That's what we should do with their government," Olson said.
this is what happens to any nation that deals with usa.they don't discriminate between friends and foes all they need is to fill their stomach
once putin said that US is a hungry wolf which cares only about its hunger and nothing else
if the congress men really feels that india made any intellectual property rule/trade rule violation they could easily go to WTO for winning over the wrong decision,why to rant
These guys are raving lunatics.
U.S. Congressman Marsha Blackburn
Congressman Pete Olson : Home
We can see how well that turned out
There are politicians like this in India too...we should not give importance to what she says...this is definitely not US Government's policy...yet we always have to be careful while dealing with cunning countries like USA and China..
China is a WTO member.
Remember the Trans-Pacific Partnership? That economic bloc the US is building to contain China and bully it into better behavior? Those 300,000 lives will be the price India pays to be a part of that club. Ain't life grand?
In the end India and USA will maintain a strong relationship no matter what some people in US say whatever against India.
Even people in India like the CPI(M) criticize US economic policy in India. This is known as Right to Freedom of Speech & Expression.
This article pleases me.
The ranting of the three Republican congressmen aside, Biden is coming next month to seal some economic deals with India. So....
So MMS signs deals consigning India's generic drugmakers to the dustbin, as Biden's hands are completely tied by America's Pharma lobby (read: $3.6bn in pharma lobbying last year alone) and India's drugmakers have no equivalent lobbying machine.
I wouldn't be surprised if those pharma companies were "lobbying" the UPA or BJP to sell the TPP to India. Shackling India to their IP regime would mean tens of billions in profits over the next two decades - well worth any incremental expense on "governmental relations".
India is doing the right thing here, sticking it to the bullies of the global IP playground. Don't sell out.
USA wants to control india's energy security once this is done india's economy will be in
Usa's control. Congress government will only oblige. Don't think this is true USA already
Controls it to an extent:
IPI pipeline is dead and so is the Bush nuclear deal. India has no access to central
Remember that the US has an interest in tensions between India and Pakistan, just as they have an interest in tensions between China and Japan, Germany and the rest of the EU, and between the Muslim world and nearly everyone else.
Don't you find it slightly strange that the US has managed to build multiple monopolies on global education (the Ivy League), finance (NYC/London), international law and IP, media+internet (Google/Amazon/Apple/Facebook/Twitter) even though it's in another hemisphere from the vast majority of the G20?
Very interesting observation along with the fact that all major oil trade and currency are tied to the dollar
All major US trading partners with USA have to buy US debt so many factors have US remain a hyperpower
If anything happens to US atleast a dozen other countries will go down as well.
Separate names with a comma.