First Battle of Rajasthan - Where Arabs lost to Indians

Discussion in 'Military History' started by Srinivas_K, Jan 19, 2013.

  1. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Battle of Rajasthan - Kingdoms from South and Northern India came together to drive Arabs from India​


    The Battle of Rajasthan is a battle (or series of battles) where the Gurjar Hindu alliance defeated the Arab invaders in 738 CE and removed the Arab invaders and pillagers from the area east of the Indus River and protected whole India. The final battle took place somewhere on the borders of modern Sindh-Rajasthan. Following their defeat the remnants of the Arab army fled to the other bank of the River Indus. The main Indian kings who contributed to the victory over the Arabs were the north Indian Gurjar Emperor Nagabhata I of the Pratihara Dynasty and the south Indian Gurjar Emperor Vikramaditya II of the Chalukya dynasty in the 8th century. The Muslim conquest of Persia by Arab forces in a short space of time contrasts sharply to the defeat of the Arab armies by the Hindus.


    [​IMG]

    Background

    With the break-up of the Gupta Empire (550 CE), northern India was covered with warring states, which attempted to wrest the imperial position left vacant by the Guptas. Among these were Yasodharman of Malwa, the Maitrakas of Vallabhi, and Emperor Harshavardhana of Thanesar. Emperor Harshavardhana unified whole North India in the 7th century. But in the early 8th century North India was divided into several kingdoms. The most powerful kingdoms of North India in the 8th century were the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty and the Pala dynasty.
    Before the onset of this age West Asia was conquered by the politico-religious ideology of Islam (7th Century). Under the Umayyad Caliphs the Muslim Arabs attempted to conquer the frontier kingdoms of India; Kabul, Zabul, and Sindh, but were repulsed. In the early 8th Century the Kingdom of Sindh under Brahmin King Dahir of the Rai dynasty was convulsed by internal strife——taking advantage of the conditions the Arabs renewed their assaults and finally occupied it under Muhammad ibn Qasim, the nephew of Al-Hajjaj (governor of Iraq and Khurasan). Qasim and his successors attempted to expand from Sindh into Punjab and other regions but were badly defeated by Lalitaditya of Kashmir and Yasovarman of Kannauj. Even their position in Sindh was unstable at this time. Arab forces failed to make any substantial gains in India.(Mohammed-Bin-Qasim got defeated here)

    Events leading up to the battle

    Junayd ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Murri, the successor of Muhammad ibn Qasim, finally subdued the Hindu resistance within Sindh. Taking advantage of the conditions in Western India, which at that time was covered with several small states, Junaid led a large army into the region in early 730 CE. Dividing this force into two he plundered several cities in southern Rajasthan, western Malwa, and Gujarat.
    Indian records confirm this invasion but record the Arab success only against the smaller states in Gujarat. They also record the defeat of the Arabs at two places. The southern army moving south into Gujarat was defeated at Navsari by Avanijanashraya Pulakesi who was sent by the South Indian Gurjar Emperor Vikramaditya II of the Chalukya Empire. The army that went east, reached Avanti whose ruler Gurjara Pratihara [2] Nagabhata I utterly defeated the invaders and they fled to save their life.

    The Battle of Rajasthan

    Gauging at the seriousness of the situation as well as the power of the arab forces, pratihara king, Nagabhata made pact with Jaysimha Varman of the Rashtrakuta Empire. Jaysimha in turn sent his son Avanijanashraya Pulakesi to support Nagabhata. The two Dynasties of India supplemented the already fighting Hindu Gurjar Mewar Kingdom, under Bappa Rawal, at the border of Rajasthan.
    The battle was fought between 5,000-6,000 Gurjar Infantry and cavalry facing more than 30,000 Arabs. The Gurjar fought bravely and managed to kill the Arab leader Emir Junaid during the war. This enhanced the morale of the Gurjar hindu forces while the Arabs disorganized and demoralized due to their leaders death retreated and were frequently attacked by local forces until they reached the indus river taking great casualties.[3]


    Aftermath

    Junayd's successor Tamim ibn Zaid al-Utbi organized a fresh campaigns against Rajasthan but failed to hold any territories there. He would be further pushed across River Indus by the combined forces of the King of Kannauj, Nagabhata C.E. thus limiting the Arabs to the territory of Sindh across River Indus.
    In the words of the Arab chronicler Suleiman, “a place of refuge to which the Muslims might flee was not to be found.” The Arabs crossed over to the other side of the River Indus, abandoning all their lands to the victorious Indian kings. The local chieftains took advantage of these conditions to re-establish their independence. Subsequently the Arabs constructed the city of Mansurah on the other side of the wide and deep Indus, which was safe from attack. This became their new capital in Sindh.

    Equipment and resources

    In the Gwalior inscription it is recorded that Nagabhata I “crushed the large army of the powerful Mlechcha king.” This large army consisted of cavalry, infantry, siege artillery, and probably a force of camels. Since Tamin was a new governor he had a force of Syrian cavalry from Damascus, local Arab contingents, converted Hindus of Sindh, and foreign mercenaries like the Turks. All together the invading army have had anywhere between 50,000-60,000 men. In comparison the Indians had around 30,000-40,000 men.
    The Arab chronicler Suleiman describes the army of the Imperial Gurjara Pratiharas as it stood in 851 CE; The king of Gurjars maintains numerous forces and no other Indian prince has so fine a cavalry. He is unfriendly to the Arabs, still he acknowledges that the king of the Arabs is the greatest of kings. Among the princes of India there is no greater foe of the Islamic faith than he. He has got riches, and his camels and horses are numerous.[4]

    But at the time of the Battle of Rajasthan the Gurjar Pratihars[5] had only just risen to power. In fact Nagabhatta was their first prominent ruler. But the composition of his army, which was predominantly cavalry, is clear from the description. There are other anecdotal references to the Indian kings and commanders riding elephants to have a clear view of the battlefield. The infantry stood behind the elephants and the cavalry formed the wings and advanced guard.

    Later events

    The Arabs in Sindh took a long time to recover from their defeat. In the early 9th Century the governor Bashar attempted an invasion of India but was defeated. Even a naval expedition sent by the Caliphs was defeated by the Saindhava clan of Kathiawar. After this the Arab chroniclers admit that the Caliph Mahdi, “gave up the project of conquering any part of India'.”
    The Arabs in Sindh lost all power and broke up into two warring Shia states of Mansurah and Multan, both of which paid tribute to the Gurjara Pratiharas. The local resistance in Sindh, which had not yet died out and was inspired by the victories of their Indian neighbors manifested itself when the foreign rulers were overthrown and Sindh came under its own dynasties like the Soomras and Sammas.

    Battle of Rajasthan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
  2.  
  3. DEJAVU

    DEJAVU Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    GALAXY
    so whats the point?
     
  4. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Just for Info. related to History of India.
     
  5. manish_mnsp

    manish_mnsp New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HYderabad
    great info thanks !!
     
  6. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    in 738 the arab were quite new to south asia(712) ..


    as they got numerical strength they grabbed majority of south asia under them with the passage of time

    b/w Muhammad bin qasim was just 17 years old when he started conquering south asia
     
  7. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    4,147
    Yes we know that how he raped your grand mothers and you were born i.e. today's pakistan!
     
    Bornubus, parijataka, kseeker and 2 others like this.
  8. sob

    sob Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    6,359
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Does everything have to have a point.
     
    Kshatriya87 and W.G.Ewald like this.
  9. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    we are not indians
     
  10. DEJAVU

    DEJAVU Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    GALAXY
    i think Qasim was involved in delhi gang rape too,
    May Allah bless lady Amanat in heaven.
    rape is not a joke, they are some ladies here.
    Respect them.
     
  11. DEJAVU

    DEJAVU Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    GALAXY
    Farhan bhai invaders always new in invading countries :)
    yeah it was first. but Islam was first entered india through Kerala as many historians and some islamic books revealed that.
    Qasim and Arabs send a very small army and it was a successful conquest as per their plans.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2013
  12. Shaitan

    Shaitan Zandu balm all day Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,402
    Likes Received:
    3,412
    Location:
    Judica
    Arabs never got majority of India.
     
    maomao likes this.
  13. Srinivas_K

    Srinivas_K Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    3,355
    Arabs left the Dream of Conquering India after this Battle.
     
    Kshatriya87 and maomao like this.
  14. Decklander

    Decklander New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    4,044
    Location:
    New Delhi
    You must also must not forget that Arabs had attempted twice before Quasim came and each time they were defeated decisively by King Dahir of Brahmanabad of Sindh. Quasim was part of third attempt and King Dahir lost due to internal problems within his kingdom and not due to the bravado of Arabs.
    It is correct that islam appeared in Kerala nearly same time as Mecca thru slaves of Arab traders.
     
    gokussj9, maomao and SPIEZ like this.
  15. SPIEZ

    SPIEZ Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,507
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    :rofl:

    Source: Afghanistan was inhabited by the Aryan tribes and controlled by the Medes until about 500 BC

    Yeah we do not wish to associate ourselves with you either. However history is history
     
  16. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    4,147
    After reading your logic, I'm sure that you are a resultant of age old islamic rapes and inbreeding! :)
     
    Bornubus and Das ka das like this.
  17. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    because arab concentrated more on persia onwards

    and the same persians than invaded india?

    so because of arabs conquest of Persia the persians later invaded india
     
  18. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    and you think your aryan?

    history might be history for you..but we will even change the history where we are associated with indians

    so simple
     
  19. SPIEZ

    SPIEZ Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,507
    Likes Received:
    1,009
    :rofl: :pound: :rotflmao:

    Gem of a statement. Stupidity doesn't get better.
     
  20. Decklander

    Decklander New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    4,044
    Location:
    New Delhi
    history might be history for you..but we will even change the history where we are associated with indians

    so simple

    Those who call themselves the children of invaders and also from CIS have already changed the history.
     
    kseeker, gokussj9 and maomao like this.
  21. farhan_9909

    farhan_9909 Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,895
    Likes Received:
    496
    Location:
    Abbottabad,Bannu
    what buzz me off why are the indians hell bent on proving that Pakistanis has indian origin

    i mean do you have any proof?countries were merged due to foriegn invasion for some 1000's years.this doesnt make us indians y origin

    we are pakistanis
     

Share This Page