And China will be like Russia and Eastern Europe by then.
But I think that we are at high risk of going off topic.
So, here is a fresh on topic screenshot.
View attachment 11497
Pakistani Think Tanks!!!!
Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings
- Thread starter A.V.
- Start date
republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,960
- Likes
- 2,700
Wait for a year or so they'll have PNS Bismillah that would operate on Anti-Matter drives and will be capable of operating a fleet of heavy transport jets by 2050s. 
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,289
- Likes
- 56,243
And the jet carried will have name "Hawai Mullah".:biggrin2:Wait for a year or so they'll have PNS Bismillah that would operate on Anti-Matter drives and will be capable of operating a fleet of heavy transport jets by 2050s.
republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,960
- Likes
- 2,700
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,719
- Likes
- 11,620
They won't stand a second more than 10 yearsWait for a year or so they'll have PNS Bismillah that would operate on Anti-Matter drives and will be capable of operating a fleet of heavy transport jets by 2050s.
.................................................
Tab humlog kiski liya karenge??????????
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2016
- Messages
- 502
- Likes
- 620
And then there is a born beggar...
http://m.rediff.com/cricket/report/...-icc-events-we-should-get-points/20161109.htm
http://m.rediff.com/cricket/report/...-icc-events-we-should-get-points/20161109.htm
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2015
- Messages
- 5,005
- Likes
- 8,881
But but but....you forgot to mention CPEC......Dollars will replace tissue papers.
Pakistani per capita income growth is nearly half of India (6.36% on 3.02%). Over that, their fertility rates and population growth is much higher than us. So, annual population outlook till 2050 for Pakistan is going to be 1.1% against world average 0.6% and India's 0.7%.
Pakistani HDI is 0.538 (low) just 0.001 from 0.537 against India's 0.609 (0.023; from 0.586) and world average 0.712 (0.009; from 0.702). It lags in hunger index, education index, literacy etc., with mild improvements.
Now, let's turn our time machine back in history.
Pakistan had better HDI in 1991, higher GDP (PPP) per capita, Education Index in 2000-2001, higher GDP (nominal) per capita around 2006-07, better hunger index in 2012 but was overtaken in every index one by one.
Even this year, Pakistani GDP per capita was up to $5084 ($1520 nominal) from last year's $49450 ($1470 nominal) against India's $6599 ($1820 nominal) from last year's $6162 ($1688). Simply, for near 2020, Pak must be around $6000-7000 against India's $10,000 ($2500 vs $1800 in nominal).
India's rate is standard but Pakistan is a developing country with per capita income growth close to developed countries!
Now, for case of India, considering our growth sustained for just 10 years (neither lesser nor higher) and declining by 0.5% decade on decade, India's GDP per capita is projected to be between $50-65000 ($20-30,000 in nominal) and it's simply income middle income economy for MER around 2070 because developed countries will have per capita incomes in order between $150,000 to $200,000). Pakistan already lags badly both in growth and quantity.
[Sorry for such rough ranges, actually I took account all the three; low, medium and high fertility rates in account].
Sent from my ASUS_Z00LD using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2015
- Messages
- 5,005
- Likes
- 8,881
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,289
- Likes
- 56,243
Transitional economy.
Even, if CPEC succeeds, it can help to get 2-3% higher growth for a decade (per capita growth will again be nullified by population growth rate).
Though, it can help consumption rate (not to locals to improve living standards but corridor), it can save this crumbling economy from bankruptcy by sustaining a short term but good growth rate.
[Yes, CPEC has the substance to save Pak, that" game changer" and dollar flow is bs.]
If 20% of GDP is invested in such an economy, it boosts growth by 2% but at first place, a lot of investments in CPEC are provided locally by Pakistan and not China which is useless. Honestly, I can't understand why Pak is dragging it. Instead, the issue must be raised with China if they really want something.
raheel besharam
Regular Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 851
- Likes
- 2,004
LoL
___________________________________
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2015
- Messages
- 5,005
- Likes
- 8,881
Their leaders need bigger balls to send afghans back.
does UN giving pakis funds for keeping afghans there ?
Sent from my ASUS_Z00LD using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 4,836
- Likes
- 10,862
Na they won't do it. They are the self appointed guardians and protectors of the Islamic world. They won't turn their back on their Muslim brothers even if they get screwed in the ass as a result.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 31,933
- Likes
- 148,155
Yes UN gives funds for documented immigrants and also from USAID. Hence the rhetoric of sending back undocumented Afghan immigrants.
And none of the aid goes to the immigrants fully, I think.
republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,960
- Likes
- 2,700
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,289
- Likes
- 56,243
And buying/begging f-16 tayyare.Yup, it is consumed in making of "atomeee hathiyaar".
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 4,836
- Likes
- 10,862
WOW
Bad days are coming for Pakis
Bad days are coming for Pakis
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 731
- Likes
- 1,688
That Modagudu translates to "suck my dick" in Telugu LOL.
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,719
- Likes
- 11,620
I said this few months age
WHY NOT MIX PIG BLOOD IN THE RIVERS FLOORING TOWARDS THEM????
EK RAAT MEIN SAALE HARAM KAR BAITHENGE
