Chinese Defense Ministry Confirms Hypersonic Missile Test

Discussion in 'China' started by LTE-TDD, Jan 16, 2014.

  1. LTE-TDD

    LTE-TDD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    20
    BY: Bill GertzFollow @billGertz
    January 15, 2014 6:00 pm

    China’s Defense Ministry on Wednesday confirmed that weapons designers recently conducted the first test of an ultra-high speed missile vehicle considered cutting edge military technology.

    In a two-sentence statement faxed to news agencies and state-run media in Beijing, the ministry confirmed the flight test of a new hypersonic glide vehicle.

    U.S. defense officials said the test of what the Pentagon is calling the WU-14 hypersonic glide vehicle took place Jan. 9 over China.

    The ministry confirmed the test after it was first reported by the Washington Free Beacon Jan. 13.

    “Our planned scientific research tests conducted in our territory are normal,” the ministry said in the statement. “These tests are not targeted at any country and at any specific goals.”

    China military affairs analysts said the hypersonic vehicle test represents a major milestone in China’s military buildup of weapons it calls “assassin’s mace” arms—weaponry designed to allow a weaker power to defeat a stronger one.


    “While round after round of defense cuts have knocked America’s technological advantage on its back, the Chinese and other competitor nations push towards military parity with the United States; in some cases, as in this one, they appear to be leaping ahead of us,” Chairman Rep. Howard P. “Buck“ McKeon (R., Calif.), Rep. Randy Forbes (R., Va.), and Rep. Mike Rogers (R., Ala.) said in a statement Jan. 14.

    Rick Fisher, a China military affairs expert, said the defense ministry confirmation was an unusual but positive sign.

    When disclosures appeared in the past in the U.S. press on Chinese missile tests, similar brief comments were made.

    “The implication is that the more U.S. officials say about Chinese military developments, the more it is possible to encourage China to itself become more transparent militarily,” said Fisher, with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

    “It appears that for too long U.S. officials have refused to disclose publicly what it is possible to reveal, even within limits needed to protect sources, because these officials feared offending their Chinese counterparts.”

    “China’s test of a hypersonic glide vehicle proves that American reticence about China’s high-tech military developments diminishes American security by detracting from a needed political debate about real American defense requirements,” Fisher said. “We are in effect disarming ourselves.”

    Officials familiar with some details of the hypersonic glide vehicle test said the high-speed glider appears designed to fit on top of an intercontinental ballistic missile. Using that booster, the vehicle is lofted to a height of 62 miles or less and then released. It then maneuvers at speeds as high as Mach 10, or 7,680 miles per hour, to its target.

    U.S. missile defenses are designed to counter hypersonic targets, namely ballistic missile warheads. What is different about the hypersonic vehicle is that its trajectory does not enter space, and that makes it more difficult to detect, track, and intercept with a missile defense interceptor.

    Pentagon spokesman Marine Corps Lt. Col. Jeffrey Pool confirmed the test last week. “We routinely monitor foreign defense activities and we are aware of this test,” he said.

    Spokeswoman Marie Harf at the State Department had no immediate comment on the test.

    On Capitol Hill, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and two subcommittee chairman voiced concerns over what they said was a technological “leap” by the Chinese with the hypersonic vehicle test.

    “While round after round of defense cuts have knocked America’s technological advantage on its back, the Chinese and other competitor nations push towards military parity with the United States; in some cases, as in this one, they appear to be leaping ahead of us,” Chairman Rep. Howard P. “Buck“ McKeon (R., Calif.), Rep. Randy Forbes (R., Va.), and Rep. Mike Rogers (R., Ala.) said in a statement Jan. 14.

    Rick Fisher, a China military affairs expert, said the defense ministry confirmation was an unusual but positive sign.

    When disclosures appeared in the past in the U.S. press on Chinese missile tests, similar brief comments were made.

    “The implication is that the more U.S. officials say about Chinese military developments, the more it is possible to encourage China to itself become more transparent militarily,” said Fisher, with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

    “It appears that for too long U.S. officials have refused to disclose publicly what it is possible to reveal, even within limits needed to protect sources, because these officials feared offending their Chinese counterparts.”

    “China’s test of a hypersonic glide vehicle proves that American reticence about China’s high-tech military developments diminishes American security by detracting from a needed political debate about real American defense requirements,” Fisher said. “We are in effect disarming ourselves.”

    Lora Saalman, a specialist on China’s military with the Carnegie Endowment, said the hypersonic test highlights a new trend in Chinese transparency.

    Chinese experts have in the past emphasized transparency of intent over capabilities, she said.

    “However, China has increasingly become a country of transparency through display of capabilities rather than intent,” she said. “This has occurred in a range of areas from anti-satellite and ballistic missile defense tests to unveiling of stealth fighters and unmanned air vehicles.”

    “This is China’s new form of transparency,” Saalman said. “It suggests that China’s official statements, white papers, and posture declarations are lagging behind its military developments. This is why placing an emphasis on Chinese technical studies to supplement often staid official statements is crucial.”

    The United States is developing two hypersonic vehicles, the unpowered HTV-2, or Hypersonic Technology Vehicle-2, and the X-51 Waverider, a scramjet powered high-speed vehicle.

    A report by the Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence Center stated recently that Russia is building “a new class of hypersonic vehicle” that would “allow Russian strategic missiles to penetrate missile defense systems.”

    A former commander of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces in Moscow said China’s hypersonic vehicle test was a milestone but that Beijing trails both Russia and the United States in the development of the arms.

    “China has hardly surpassed the Americans and the Russians as it has just accomplished its first hypersonic missile test,” former Strategic Rocket Forces commander Col. Gen. Viktor Yesin told Interfax-AVN.

    “History shows there are no miracles in the development of missile systems.”

    Yesin, an adviser to Russian military leaders, commented prior to the Chinese Defense Ministry confirmation of the test and said that if the test were confirmed “then China has taken the path of the United States and Russia that started to design such missiles in the beginning of this century.”

    Without access to the Chinese test results it is impossible to gauge the success of China’s hypersonic weapons program.

    “We should say at the same time that the United States and Russia have conducted a number of hypersonic missile tests but they have not achieved the successful separation of glide hypersonic warheads,” he said.

    “The designers have run into numerous problems and most of them have not been resolved so far.”

    Yesin said he expects the Chinese to encounter similar problems.

    Chinese Defense Ministry Confirms Hypersonic Missile Test | Washington Free Beacon
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  2.  
  3. redragon

    redragon Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    36
    China will be changed from "challenger to statu quo" to "defender of world peace" soon, maybe another 5 yrs.
    Mod, please merge this thread with the earlier one, thank you.
     
  4. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    If it is not against any other nation nor for a specific goal, then what is it for?

    Burning up excessive money which could have been spent for the poorer Province of China like NINGXIA AUTONOMOUS REGION etc?
     
  5. no smoking

    no smoking Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,172
    Likes Received:
    422
    As same as India: for the peace of world.:cool2:

    Did you copy this from those westerners say about India's missile project?
     
  6. LTE-TDD

    LTE-TDD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    20
    Finally, they learned how to copy and paste.
     
    TrueSpirit1 likes this.
  7. rockdog

    rockdog Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    34
    Each C-17 transport plane India purchased would build 100,000 toilet for Bombay's 3 million people level slum...

    And 6 C-17 transport plane India purchased can save its 40% of children out of malnutrition.
     
  8. bose

    bose Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    Kolkata, India.
    So what is your point ??? Please care to elaborate...
     
  9. GromHellscream

    GromHellscream Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2012
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    WOW
    It's against for every other country in this world, so not the specific ones.
     
  10. bose

    bose Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    Kolkata, India.
    illigal copy and paste requires very high IQ... Since only Chinese have such high IQ... India needs lot to catch up !!
     
  11. TrueSpirit1

    TrueSpirit1 The Nobody Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,575
    Likes Received:
    1,014
    Location:
    India
    We have a very long way to go to even imagine catching up...you guys ROCK :rotfl:
     
  12. amoy

    amoy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    1,545
    hmmm the point might include if u're not good at copy/paste (as a late mover) u'll hav to spend $$ on fueling others' R&D rather than your own. no wonder India never evolves fm the worlds top arms buyer to indigenous…

    by the way copy fm whom? Comrade Yesin said bth US and Russia had problms in hypersonic tests.

    Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
     
  13. bose

    bose Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    Kolkata, India.
    India was not fortunate like China to get the Technology & Industrial infrustracture assets from Soviets for free from as early as 1950 to mid 1960's ... Then from 1980's onwards from the western world as a source of cheap lebor and production base....

    paying in cash for other's design for local manufacture is not what I call indegenious...

    China has failed to show a innovative mind except on copy & paste...

    India is steadily evolving in all respects in its own terms one likes it or not...

    if one have an intension to copy and paste then one did not need to look for a Comrade !!
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2014
  14. badguy2000

    badguy2000 Respected Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,957
    Likes Received:
    613
    CHina-made highspeed train create a new world record,with a speed of 605KM/H..

    it easily break frenchman-made older record ...

    so,where is MR. armand?....

    [​IMG]、
    中國評論新聞:國內試驗時速605公里列車
     
  15. bose

    bose Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    Kolkata, India.
  16. t_co

    t_co Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,537
    Likes Received:
    699
    Location:
    China
    It only took Ray 33000 posts...
     
  17. amoy

    amoy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,521
    Likes Received:
    1,545
    Chinese just completed Ankara - Istanbul "hypersonic" railway. sweet isnt it? and even your Bombay metro is reported to import fm China…

    Sent from my 5910 using Tapatalk 2
     
  18. bose

    bose Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,956
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    Kolkata, India.
    Very true!! How many times the speed of sound it travels ??


    Bad Idea!! India make better coaches than China...
     
    redragon likes this.
  19. redragon

    redragon Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    36
    Oh yeah!! I learned something new, in India, better=slower/backward. Thank you
     
  20. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    No, it is what the Chinese always says whenever any nation tests their weapons.
     
  21. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Indeed it would.

    But what to do, when the Chinese are so busy pursuing their imperialism towards India and India instead of building toilets have to ensure weapon and platforms are there to stave off the Yellow Peril.
     

Share This Page