HariPrasad-1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 9,621
- Likes
- 21,088
I think you have some insider Information.Wrong!
Because Amrinder singh was rejected visa to hold rallies in Canada.
I think you have some insider Information.Wrong!
Because Amrinder singh was rejected visa to hold rallies in Canada.
Their nuclear supply to India is a mutual-interest deal. No one gains disproportionately than the other party. It's not something they can scrap off on a whim. There are thousands of jobs and billions of dollars worth of revenue resting on India-Canada Uranium trade.Delhi did not snub Justin Trudeau but his vote-bank politics is cause for concern : Former High Commissioner of India to Canada
Indian side had repeatedly suggested that Trudeau first have his official engagements (of 7-day visit, the longest in recent times by a head of government) in Delhi before travelling to other cities: Says government sources, but It was Canada, according to official sources, which insisted that Trudeau’s official engagements in Delhi take place towards the end of his India visit.
Official sources here confirmed that Canada was initially reluctant to have Trudeau meet Singh because the latter had last year refused to meet Sajjan calling him a Khalistani sympathiser. While Trudeau is expected to reiterate Canada’s position that it fully supports a unified India, India wants Trudeau to also ensure that his Sikh ministers are not seen as endorsing in any way the Khalistan movement.
Another diplomatic headache for India was the perception that Canada, an important supplier of uranium to India which has also backed India’s NSG membership bid to the hilt, was being ignored by the Indian establishment. Trudeau detractors in Canada were quick to claim that Modi had snubbed him by not receiving him at the airport and also by not accompanying him to Ahmedabad, the city Trudeau visited with his family on Monday before flying to Mumbai.
You have to give it to the libtards no for how dum they areTrudeau supports Khalistanis as well as jihadists.
Quite an accomplishment by Canadians to elect such a broad minded PM.
Trudeau sparks outrage with plan to ‘reintegrate’ ISIS terrorists into Canada
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/t...an-to-reintegrate-isis-terrorists-into-canada
Justin Trudeau-another useful idiot dhimmi or a closet Muslim jihadist?
http://www.freedompost.org/traitor/...idiot-dhimmi-or-a-closet-muslim-jihadist.html
If a picture is worth a thousand words, here is half a dozen. The photos are self-explanatory and no words are needed. Now one can add “Muslim useful idiot” or “dhimmi” and “Canada’s Prime minister”, unfortunately, to the list of Justin Trudeau’s so-called accomplishments: Camp instructor, snowboard instructor, bouncer, radio talk show, white-water rafting instructor, high school teacher, engineer school dropout, grad school dropout, Muslim useful idiot, Canada’s Prime Minister.
Western lefties would support any cause that angers right wingers. They don't really give a damn about any "minority" groups be it Muslims, sikhs, LGBTXYZ. Their only concern is to hate right wingers and use whatever bunch of people that come in handy.You have to give it to the libtards no for how dum they are
Who on earth is he to support or not support a "United India"? Can a rat support the rights of a lion?https://www.indiatoday.in/trudeau-i...da-supports-a-united-india-1173471-2018-02-20
Turdeww bending over backwards.
______________________________
Rallies cancelled: Captain Amarinder writes to Canadian govt about ‘gag order’I think you have some insider Information.
http://indianexpress.com/article/ci...-to-canadian-govt-protests-gag-order-2766469/A day after being denied permission to hold rallies in Canada, Punjab Congress president Capt Amarinder Friday lodged a protest with the Canadian government calling it a “gag order”.
Ding ding, bingo! Kaptaan is just angry that his podgy ass was not allowed to campaign in Canada and his highness had to return from there in a huff.Wrong!
Because Amrinder singh was rejected visa to hold rallies in Canada.
Congress leaders are never what you think of them..always turn out to be more desperate,selfish and corrupt.Ding ding, bingo! Kaptaan is just angry that his podgy ass was not allowed to campaign in Canada and his highness had to return from there in a huff.
Nope. Khalistani hate is ideologically driven. Just like Mullahs they would hate Hindus even if you give them everything they want.Why can't we just punish criminals involved in 1984 riots, half of the khalistanis will automatically turn into hardcore Indians by just one move
It's still a curious case. More than 60% of the landmass of their proposed Khalistan is in present day Pakistan and yet, neither do they demand it, nor does Pakistan feel squeamish about Khalistanis, nor did any Khalistanis bomb any Pakistani airliners in the past, unlike they did for Indian airliners. When Khalistanis in Canada ban people, they only ban Indian officials, not Pakistanis, although it is Pakistan who has occupied their land and reduced the Sikh population. What makes Khalsitan an India-centric operation?Nope. Khalistani hate is ideologically driven. Just like Mullahs they would hate Hindus even if you give them everything they want.
It's not just this. Kaneda is full of virtue signalling assholes.Ding ding, bingo! Kaptaan is just angry that his podgy ass was not allowed to campaign in Canada and his highness had to return from there in a huff.
But insurgency is based on insurgents having local support and cover among people. If Khalistanis try to do anything in Pakistan, the tiny numbers of Sikhs in Pakistan would be chased out from the country. They can only larp as babbar khalsa against Hindus and non-Khalistan supporting Sikhs of Punjab.It's still a curious case. More than 60% of the landmass of their proposed Khalistan is in present day Pakistan and yet, neither do they demand it, nor does Pakistan feel squeamish about Khalistanis, nor did any Khalistanis bomb any Pakistani airliners in the past, unlike they did for Indian airliners. When Khalistanis in Canada ban people, they only ban Indian officials, not Pakistanis, although it is Pakistan who has occupied their land and reduced the Sikh population. What makes Khalsitan an India-centric operation?
The only sensible talk I've heard about this issue is from an Army veteran who said "India should have grabbed the monster by the horns and turned it around and started a Khalistani insurgency inside Pakistan".
This line of thought is as big a fallacy as believing that if India gives up Kashmir, there will be eternal peace with Pakistan and LeT, JeM jihadis will go back to their madrasahs.Why can't we just punish criminals involved in 1984 riots, half of the khalistanis will automatically turn into hardcore Indians by just one move
No one killed Sikhs, what you are talking about ?Why can't we just punish criminals involved in 1984 riots, half of the khalistanis will automatically turn into hardcore Indians by just one move
They can direct the hostility of Canadian Khalistanis against Pakistan, even if there is no ground support in Pakistan (just like there is no ground support in India as well). Never seen a Canadian Khalistani on social media say "Pakistan, vacate our land". They say that about India, even though Indian Sikhs are not receptive to that message.But insurgency is based on insurgents having local support and cover among people. If Khalistanis try to do anything in Pakistan, the tiny numbers of Sikhs in Pakistan would be chased out from the country. They can only larp as babbar khalsa against Hindus and non-Khalistan supporting Sikhs of Punjab.
SPG was created after the shooting of Indira. Till then Dilli Police and IB were responsible for her security.Being a strong PM doesn't mean Indira's tribe should impose reprisals on the entire group. Her protection was the duty of the SPG. Any lapse was a failure of the SPG and intel. It is not a valid excuse to ruin Hindu-Sikh relations for an intel lapse.