Beidou (Compass) Satellite Navigation and Positioning System

Discussion in 'China' started by amoy, Jan 24, 2010.

  1. amoy

    amoy Senior Member Senior Member

    Jan 17, 2010
    Likes Received:
    Believe this is of higher strategic importance

    Beidou navigation system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Compass navigation system
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    The Compass system (also known as Beidou-2, BD2) is a project by China to develop an independent global satellite navigation system. [1]

    Compass is not an extension to the previously deployed Beidou-1, but a new GNSS system similar in principle to GPS and Galileo.

    Contents [hide]
    1 General
    2 Compass-M1
    3 Compass launches
    4 References
    5 External links

    [edit] General
    The new system will be a constellation of 35 satellites, which include 5 geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites and 30 medium Earth orbit (MEO) satellites, that will offer complete coverage of the globe. The ranging signals are based on the CDMA principle and have complex structure typical to Galileo or modernized GPS. Similarly to the other GNSS, there will be two levels of positioning service: open and restricted (military). The public service shall be available globally to general users. When all the currently planned GNSS systems are deployed, the users will benefit from the use of a total constellation of 75+ satellites, which will significantly improve all the aspects of positioning, especially availability of the signals in so-called “urban canyons” [2]. The general designer of Compass navigation system is Mr. Sun Jiadong (孙家栋), who is also the general designer of its predecessor,Beidou navigation system.

    Frequency allocation of GPS, Galileo, and Compass; the light red color of E1 band indicates that the transmission in this band has not yet been detectedFrequencies for Compass are allocated in four bands: E1, E2, E5B, and E6 and overlap with Galileo. The fact of overlapping could be convenient from the point of view of the receiver design, but on the other hand raises the issues of inter-system interference, especially within E1 and E2 bands, which are allocated for Galileo’s publicly-regulated service [3]. However, under International Telecommunications Union (ITU) policies, the first nation to start broadcasting in a specific frequency will have priority to that frequency, and any subsequent users will be required to obtain permission prior to using that frequency, and otherwise ensure that their broadcasts do not interfere with the original nation's broadcasts. It now appears that Chinese Compass satellites will start transmitting in the E1, E2, E5B, and E6 bands before Europe's Galileo satellites and thus have primary rights to these frequency ranges.[4].

    Although almost nothing has yet been officially announced by Chinese authorities about the signals of the new system, the launch of the first Compass satellite permitted independent researchers not only to study general characteristics of the signals but even to build a Compass receiver.

    [edit] Compass-M1
    Compass-M1 is an experimental satellite launched for signal testing and validation and for the frequency filing on April 14, 2007. The role of Compass-M1 for Compass is similar to the role of GIOVE satellites for Galileo. The signals of Compass-M1 are to a great extent unraveled by independent research. The orbit of Compass-M1 is nearly circular, has an altitude of 21,150 km and an inclination of 55.5 degrees.

    Compass-M1 is transmitting in 3 bands: E2, E5B, and E6. In each frequency band two coherent sub-signals have been detected with a phase shift of 90 degrees (in quadrature). These signal components are further referred to as “I” and “Q”. The “I” components have shorter codes and are likely to be intended for the open service. The “Q” components have much longer codes, are more interference resistive, and are probably intended for the restricted service.

    The investigation of the transmitted signals started immediately after the launch of COMPASS-M1 on April 14 2007. Already in June engineers at CNES reported the spectrum and structure of the signals [5]. Next month researchers from the Stanford University reported complete decoding of the “I” signal scomponents[6][7]. The knowledge of the codes allowed a group of engineers at Septentrio to build the COMPASS receiver[8] and report tracking and multipath characteristics of the “I” signals on E2 and E5B [9].

    Characteristics of COMPASS signals reported as of May 2008 compared to GPS-L1CA Parameters E2-I E2-Q E5B-I E5B-Q E6-I E6-Q GPS L1-CA
    Native notation B1 B1 B2 B2 B3 B3 ---
    Code modulation BPSK(2) BPSK(2) BPSK(2) BPSK(10) BPSK(10) BPSK (10) BPSK (1)
    Carrier frequency, MHz 1561.098 1561.098 1207.14 1207.14 1268.52 1268.52 1575.42
    Chip rate, Mchips/sec 2.046 2.046 2.046 10.230 10.230 10.230 1.023
    Code period, chips 2046 ?? 2046 ?? 10230 ?? 1023
    Code period, msec 1.0 >400 1.0 >160 1.0 >160 1.0
    Symbols/sec 50 ?? 50 ?? 50 ?? 50
    Navigation frames, sec 6 ?? 6 ?? ?? ?? 6
    Navigation sub-frames, sec 30 ?? 30 ?? ?? ?? 30
    Navigation period, min 12.0 ?? 12.0 ?? ?? ?? 12.5

    Characteristics of the “I” signals on E2 and E5B are generally similar to the civilian codes of GPS (L1-CA and L2C), but Compass signals have somewhat greater power. The notation of Compass signals used in this page follows the naming of the frequency bands and agrees with the notation used in the American literature on the subject, but the notation used by the Chinese seems to be different and is quoted in the first row of the table.

    [edit] Compass launches
    Mission Date Name Launch center Launch vehicle Bus Orbit Status
    07-32 2007.04.13 Compass-M1 Xichang CZ-3A DFH-3 MEO 21,500km Success
    07-37 2009.04.14 Compass-G2 Jiuquan CZ-3C DFH-3 GEO drifting Success
    07-38 2010.01.16 Compass-G1 Xichang CZ-3C DFH-3 GEO ~80°E Success
  3. singa

    singa Regular Member

    Oct 2, 2009
    Likes Received:
    From my pointed of view, China gained a lot of progresses in last several years in accuracy of atomic clock. Previously, they can't make a small size atomic clock, but now seems they've made it.

Share This Page