Search results

I am for two man crew; with modern tech its possible to have two man crew, one driver and other shooter/commander. That way tank's weight could be reduced. Loading could be done through autoloader. Either person could change the role. They should think in terms of FMBT. Markava 4, type turret...

cant we have two man crew in tank, commander/gunner into one and driver, with the latest tech like drive by wire and auto loader, isnt it possible to have such a tank. Then it would weight less with turret less design.

this will show how it is done.

next FMBT GSQR

Kunal if they want light weight tank they should have asked for "drive by wire tech" which is similar to fly by wire develop for LCA, that way only two operator for the tank would have been needed driver and commander. With auto loader no need for gunner and loader. With turret less design and...

Brother let me say this if Russian or Western countries make this FMBT, some people will jump with joy, if DRDO/OFB makes this then they will say it needs to go to moon on its own and fight the battles their. It is outrageous those guys just copy post, Jane defence for the dream tank.

they forget to add FMBT should fly and supercruise. :emot0:

it was DGMF who give the lollipop of FMBT.......... he wanted to look 20 years ahead, after the cancellation of Russian T 95 his FMBT is dead and buried. I am sure he is the intelligent one to come up with Laser gun for the FMBT (Arjun) tank.

they forget to ask the tank laser to take out missiles.....................I Love IA............must be our old friend DGMF he want FMBT.........

they forget to add that they want tank which can fly, hover and fire lasers projectile............ as FMBT.