Search results

Hence I always say never argue with a fool , he will beat you down with his stupidity and ignorance eventually. Also don't forget to take your concerns to the Russian RVSN RF who embed dedicated anti sabotage and counter ambush escorts units to accompany their TELs within their territory lol...

Don't know if you guys know , Indian strategic TELs have correspondingly higher number no of reloads accompanying it. I kind of find it perplexing Having one reload per TEL ( with own loaded round ) is fine but more than one, kind of beats me. I have no idea on the reload time but even if it...

MIRVs are already operational , 3 per payload . However to increase it beyond that we will need the open sea test range to be operational for validation. I posted pic of K5/A6 nose cone it is blunt with retracting aerospike . Now understand why . If needed compare it with very old DRDO IIT...

I always try to avoid any conversation with you because you and you stupidity is not worth my time But for the sake of the readers here , I will call out your hogwash Increase survivability how exactly ? That too against direct or indirect counter force targeting with either massive...

As for why India does not go for Russian style TEL , reasons are many 1. Costs involved in development and production versus the number required for production is too high to justify it. 2. Indian landmass is not sparsely populated, can't have a tel roaming about with jihadis and commies in...

I posted the pic like 2 years back , it is old and discontinued A newer A5 tel is in production. I have posted it's pic earlier. I seriously don't understand if somebody post stuff in twitter everybody takes it seriously but post it in forum nobody bothers a glance lol

Trying hard to be a smartass and still falling short of it Well save your shit sarcasm for your own country who went crawling to the Belarussian's for their TEL after they failed in trying to copy as usual. As for what is decent or not China or a Chinese is the last person in this world to...

Answer to your question....................

You saw the K 4 video and the VK Saraswat interview , it mentions what I said , 2 generators 1. At the bottom of the silo a gas generator to push the missile out 2. A integral underwater booster (UWB) on the missile to get it the surface aka cavitator. Land launch of slbm r39

Looks like there is a possibility why there is gas ring at the nose during Liftoff Agni 3 was also meant to test technology for K-4 Those 4 circular holes could be the exhaust for the gas generators to validate or generate test / performance data on the working of a basic cavitator When a...

Does not change anything if it failed after clearing boost phase.

Interesting thumbnail of the video That's Agni 3 being launched , look at the smoke ring at the top section , where did it come from ? Definitely the 4 circular holes on payload section on which I asked questions previously Damn it certainly makes things even more complicated now. Why...

You tell me, since you were the one who butted in inspite of having no knowledge on the subject. Again seriously ? Read what you wrote again slowly and tell me whether what you wrote makes any sense ? No pain no gain and we learn everyday something new, so let me give 2 clues 1. What type...

For a certain varient of Agni 3 expect a configuration like this with max 3 MIRVs If one looks at the 1st mirv configuration attempt of other countries you will realise, generally they started with 3 ( and there is a reason for that ). India followed the same trend.

Pitch and spin thrusters for accurate reentry orientation and very high CEP via altitude control and averaging deflection.

IMO not totally correct Most help is consultancy, DRDO runs into technological bottlenecks etc the ruskies step in to troubleshoot based on their vast experience albiet at a huge cost. Though limited older technology in bits and pieces has been transferred which needed a complete revamp by DRDO...

Atleast one guy thank you :) ............................

Bhai PSLV is totally irrelevant here . except for the technology demonstrated / used in it . Take a deep breath and forget about PSLV and think only about " technological blocks " As for testing mirvs why do you think I asked this question previously ( highlighted in red ) See the big...

Sir where did I say they are explicitly compatible ? One cannot simply take a civilian system and utilise it perse , I mentioned SWaP , optimisation engineering , technology blocks didn't I ? Why are you mentioning Agni 2 ? It is irrelevant in the discussion. It sports a single RV Agni 3 has...

The relevant DRDO IIT slides for comparison with the above posts