Search results

That is because i have no faith in reliability of klj7. Its not a proven system and i am NOT going to give chinese/packies voucher the same credibility as Indian, western, Japanese or Korean ones. Until jf-17s bvr & radar capability is proven its safe to assume that klj7 is worse than kopyo.

Are you sure about this because It says nothing about any aerodynamic improvements on mk1a.

Could you share your source on this.

Messi has two choices, either play for india or china as he knows paxtan is a junior team of china. And he won't risk caatsa either

Excellent, next target 24

Infact we should use them as bargaining chip with French to get a better deal. British are not reliable & we kinda hate eachother.

Who cares, they are spent force.

Sorry my bad

To my knowledge yes

j-10c in every aspect a better choice than jf-17blk3 imho

No its not, radar is inferior (not all aesa are alike) no obgs, inferior ew.

Jf-17 in its current form is not a bvr fighter, similar to our bison. And packies doesn't has high off-boresight wvr missile either. Tejas mk1 can take on packie f-16s so no need to consider jf-17. But in future a bvr missile with an aesa seeker head would be a problem for which we should...

But mk1a is same aerodynamically to mk1, how are you expecting any of this.

No mk1 or mk1a both are more than enough for CAPS. A bigger fighter just give you more on station time. You can compensate that by larger no. mk1/mk1a or by tankers which we need anyway. Quantity has a quality of its own . On your second part, we would be lucky if we get something similar to...

First of all you don't have release a spice from high altitude all the time, you can release during a high speed steep climb from low altitude. In this method your time of exposure to a long range radar is reduced significantly. Israeli do it to mask themselves from sam threats all time. Second...

Does c5 has a two way datalink?

But should we. I my opinion we should spend our money to integrate only indian weapons and components as no one else will pay for it whereas foreign customers should shell out for integration of these foreign weapons.

I thought hammer was stop gap before rafale is integrated with spice(i.e Indian specific upgrades) as Chinese front was getting hot. First the rumours that the current air chief is trying to scuttle a follow on deal of 36 rafales for bigger 90+ order of rafale and now hammer for lca. We already...

He is still the best, Lewis didn't win with a competitive team but a dominant team since 2014.

True, most of maws are overrated system for a high flying modern aircraft ( barring something like DAS). Would pick towed decoy over maws anyday.