Search results

...as opposed to British colonialism, which was a very honorable thing.

Terror attacks do not hamper a nation in any way. Nations have a population of millions and the loss of a dozen doesn't hurt the nation at an institutional level, but in case of western nations where internet penetration is 90%+ and electronic media, mass media reach is near 100%, a terror...

So UK has gone back on its democratic obligations and imposed an emergency and suspended civil liberties by indulging in wanton surveillance and cordon of civilian population. I hope Amnesty international takes note of this violation of human rights of millions of British citizens. It's not...

Let me bring you back to the point. Running a country is not a child's play. You need to take it in its totality, you cannot cherry pick the good parts like invading others, toppling other governments, supporting insurgencies in other countries, building a nation on stolen wealth, but crib...

There's a special thread dedicated to British snobbery right on this forum. You are welcome to use the search bar to find it. It's quite rich for Britishers to not just expect but demand sympathy for blowbacks you are getting as paybacks for invading several Muslim countries as part of the...

Has this tag of India being the 'biggest victims of terrorism' ever been accepted by Britain? all I remember is whenever there is a terror attack in India, they say that it's a law and order problem and refuse to refer to the terrorists as terrorists and use worlds like 'rebels'. BBC goes to the...

Nothing much, just a law and order problem.