Search results

  1. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Isnt it funny n sad in a way, both adversaries are using same system S400 for their defence. So much for India-Russia friendship. :dude:
  2. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Nope bro. I aint second account of anyone. :fyeah:
  3. indus

    Agni V Missile

    If I wrote something wrong, do correct me. I am always willing to learn. :yo:
  4. indus

    Agni V Missile

    You mentioned them yourself.:bplease: Varying these two parameters can vary the range of missile by huge margins. Many times media has quoted that a test was carried out in depressed trajectory. Which means missile wasnt tested to maximum range but of course other parameters like engine, cep etc...
  5. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Yep. Most of the threads are running derailed. Either Mods @Dovah or @Razor are sleepy or we need more threads. :yawn:
  6. indus

    Agni V Missile

    But Mongolia, Nepal, Bhutan and many other land locked countries do exist independantly
  7. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Yes. And which one is it..........
  8. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Agree. NFU and deterrence are two different things. Deterrence is what stops an adversary from firing first. If it fires it means deterrence has failed. While NFU simply states that we wont fire first but will give a massive retaliation in case somebody nukes us first. That gives us the right to...
  9. indus

    Agni V Missile

    Most of our nuclear doctrine was prepared post 1998 tests. Since that moment we were recognised a nuclear power but not a defacto nuke power since we were out of the NPT regime. So ABV Govt had to devise ways to placate the whole World into believing that our nuclear weapons were for self...
  10. indus

    Agni V Missile

    5 to 6000 kms range is sufficient to cover all of China our immediate and visible threat. No need to push for larger ranges right now. Instead focus shld be on validating mirv, manuverable warheads and canisterisation. Also serial production should commence asap.
Top