Search results

That is the thing. They have been making stories for over a century now so non physical evidence wont do it for them, no matter how much cultural continuity we can show. Their climate makes sure that a lot of biological evidence is preserved. My guess is that they are now going to double down on...

Yup. I have read that but the typical claim will remain the same regardless. That they came fron the outside. Lazaridis/Reich paper only changes their origin. Again, I am on the same page. Even if PGW has steppe ancestry, it was these mixed people that called themselves Arya and it has nothing...

I agree. Some debate could be settled with just the PGW samples though. If its the same as IVC, or IVC + source IVC, or IVC + onge related, then it makes it clear that Aryas + Vedas etc are completely indegenous and it further makes some insights into IVC culture, religion and language. If not...

Sorry for sounding like a broken record but it would be great if you could provide links or at least titles of the papers that you mention in your replies. I agree with that assessment of diversity point being the source however many people, including researchers, say that higher STR diversity...

So, I skimmed through allensoft. According to the paper, " The CHG related ancestry likely reflects both CHG and Iranian Neolithic signals, explaining relatively high levels in south asia." Pre IVC sample sequencing, neolithic iran was thought of as the major source of ancestry for south...

Isn't it likely that those models are reading the IVC ancestry component as chg or something?

Do you have any link for that discussion? I believe without ancient Indian dna samples showing such transmission, it won't be accepted in the mainstream.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284019945_Upper_Palaeolithic_genomes_reveal_deep_roots_of_modern_Eurasians