Search results

Nothing was "confirmed" in that video. Just because an ameircan who was not involved in red flag exercises , says somethign does not make it accurate or true. He made a number of coments some of which are just not true. for example , Mig-21's do not use israili jamming pods , they use russian...

Whats happened to the edit post button. my preious post is a bit of mess , This is a quote from p2p i forgot to reply to in my previous post well that's the reality on the ground on all fronts is it not , we'll get there eventually. Well we use to get the whole engine imported before , if...

Curious statement , What reason would IAF have to scrap the Kaveri Project ? Is GTRE going on holiday for the next 10-15 years or something. GTRE will build on Kaveri , imporve on what they have from that point. They won't start all over again , the materials research that went into the...

@p2p I don't get why you keep talking about Ego and being a laughing stock with the Kaveri program Kaveri is a need , an essential and integral part of our aerospace industry. No engine is as good as no aerospace industry. You would know this in a more technical sense then i would...

the date and number are both gasbag. IAF has yet to commit to anything on the MCA beyond the ASR ADA has yet to commit on a time frame , feasibility study still under way. May be Finished by the end of the year. After that we will have set milestones and time-frame. As well as number of...

I think KAveri was meant to be tested on LCA very soon. One of the New LSP's will be configured for Kaveri testing. Not sure of the time line however.

This is the GTRE Kaveri MK-1 , the one with out help from SCHEMA. This engine has been modified fro use by the navy on their boats Its proposed as an engine for future UAV's The Kaveri can also be used to make a Gas turbine engine for the Arjun MBT or any future MBT . The engine can also be...

sigh i was hoping they actually met a project goal

I think there is something wrong with the statement I think he means 960 kg to 950 kg , which was the project goal.

If the US wanted to go back it could. But i agree with him, it would be more efficient to aim for Mars. And focus on a more international effort for the Moon. but its all a question of money, So if it is a mission to the moon or a mission to mars. Mars obviously.

Then landed on the moon with less computing power than my grapical calculator But why wont they do the same now, Its because they know easily Mistakes can happen and how inefficient the old systems ere. In the modern age, You make systems using the Modern standard. Means things are lighter...