Search results

@Pratap said LOL Thre - I was wondering how long it would take you to bring up the "nationalist" excuse following your epic fail. Your therories are rubbish, and the "evidence" you post is trash. Your theories are going nowhere. You need not worry where I bang my head - that is my...

Sorry boss. These are lame excuses. It appears that you have no information beyond lame excuses

This is David Anthony's "spread by franchising" theory which seeks to bypass genetic and archaeological evidence except where he has cooked up evidence. But your dates ("4-5000 years ago") differ from Anthony's dates. David Anthony's dates at least attempt to stick to archaeologically attested...

Here. You will like this link. It's about Haplogroup R and skin colour - just up your street. Read it all. :cool2: Haplogroup R - Supposedly The White peoples Genetics Check the map And don't forget this image

LOL! Don't shift the goalpost Either get a rebuttal for the Sharma paper or admit that you were simply bluffing when you said his paper is rejected. i will wait as long as needed but I put it to you that you will not be able to produce a rebuttal paper.

Your theory is wrong for several reasons. First the timelines don't fit There is no genetic evidence of any people coming into India 4-5,000 years ago. In fact even Linguists do not agre with that date. they say Indo-European and chariots came to India 3500 years ago no earlier - so your...

I would be happy to read any academic rebuttal of Sharma's paper if you provide a link. Academics hate it when people publish things they don't like and linguists are among the most vicious characters who have the most to lose in this and I would expect them to thrash about and protest I have...

The period is 12,000 to 6000 years ago. That is the window in which spread possibly occurred. There is evidence ofagriculture 9000 years ago in Indian northwest (Baluchistan I think) . Agriculture came much later to South India but spread to other parts earlier. genes may have spread with people...

That is EXACTLY what this paper says The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* s... [J Hum Genet. 2009] - PubMed - NCBI "The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* substantiates the autochthonous origin of Brahmins and the caste system." Sharma et al

Well the Chola empire extended up to Indonesia and Cambodia. But guess what - while this represented the only control of Indian territory by Indian kings outside of India the culture that spread was Vedic culture with the Ramayana and Mahabharata. You know the Malay Prime minster has the title...

Please Pratap ji . i never said that. All I said was that Rig veda has been badly mistranslated into English. If you read the translation it sounds like rubbish composed by blithering idiots. You need to read Aurobindo's expalantion of how the Rig Veda expounds the deepest Hindu philosophy. But...

Dravidian languages and Indo European languages certainly belong to two different language groups, but 1. It does not mean that Indian Hindi speakers came from Russia or that Sanskrit came from horse milk drinkers of central Asia. 2. It does not mean that Rig Veda can be dated to 1000 BC to...

Touché! Thank you. That is all I required from you. This looks like an admission from you that you have lost the argument in terms of genetics and archaeological arguments and now want to fall back to liguistics - which can never ever provide a timeline or direction. My argument has all...

It is an undeniable fact that Sanskrit, Russian, Lithuanian and Slavic languages have very close similarities - much closer than the similarities between Sanskrit and the Latin, Germanic or Celtic languages. According to the theories spouted by linguists - languages change constantly and if two...

That is a theory. Rig veda has "faint memory" of a horse culture and therefore Rig Veda represtents that culture and Rig veda came from people who had that culture. This is the assumption that linguists and you are trying to push as fact. No matter how much you or anyone else dismisses...

You are allowed to be fed up with an issue that is proving that your beliefs are not shared by anyone but yourself and the few "scholars" you choose to quote. However I am not fed up with you yet. I will stick on and point out every single bit of fakeology and racist non-science that you choose...

I post below a part of a chapter of a book I am writing - it is in draft form. I must stress that all translations of the Rig Veda into English or any other language are faulty and mostly utter nonsense, but since people are arguing over "facts" taken from such translations, it is essential for...

If you look at this objectively the sentence you have written as absolute nionsense - but you are merely repeating step 1 of the bluff that linguists start with. That step is in saying "All languages change over time and therefore 5000 years ago there was some language and that language was...

@Pratap Siir you are one angry man. Are your facts not strong enough on their own that you need to post a litany of complaints about posters whose viewpoint differs from your pet beliefs? May I point out that this caterwaul makes you look like a frustrated man in retreat who realizes that he...

There is an interesting connection between Sanskrit and Slovenian. There are a lot of common words but no common words for metal. This is what the paper says: http://www.korenine.si/zborniki/zbornik01/pdf/skulj_indo.pdf If Sanskrit and Slovenian separated more than 5000 years ago - it is a...