Search results

not to forget that this time IAF has told what plane it want accurately..... At times of tejas mk1 iaf was confused itself and told few more addition in 2003, result: the airframe needed to restructured and the program went in design phase taking almost 4-5 years for next flight. This won't...

lol.... Brahmos will be carried by tejas. There are two air launched brahmos . 1 is weight reduction in land launched one and other is total new which will be carried by tejas.

not delayed until ADA says p.m.

lol, if iitians have professor like prodyut das then I don't think it good to give it to them. Kaveri is operational but iaf want it to be more powerful. I don't think iitians can do such a complex technology. . and yeah there is something wrong in administration, hence many indigenous...

a jv with saab means totally dependence on them. If in future tejas mk2 sent as a contender for export and finalist are NG and mk2. Swiss will simply block the equipment supplied for tejas and accidently there won't will be a good export. . even 51% of money will go in hands of swiss for mk2...

Chander said that the flight tests are being conducted with LCA Mark-I to prove certain technologies and to familiarise the naval pilots with them. One aircraft is operational, another is on the anvil and a third will son be available to complete the trials. After that, for full...

this is old style, sir, if you can't win debate then call them kid and immature.... I have already given reason why tejas have lower RCS but people won't want to read it and directly start to debate

I was quite suspicious about the word ' india' since su30mki is russian fighter made in india but the link by ersakthivel clearly says manufactured indigenously ,su30mki is manufactured indigenously. . there was another link quoting gripen c will be upgraded to E with aesa radar( surprisingly...

@Pulkit its just an article of assumption. Reliable sources have quote of drdo,hal,iaf etc. Or of their official spokesperson.

there are many reasons for sharing . yesterday I didn't posted the article about help of saab for mk2 will be great and later you posted it. Now that's I posted that article earlier....... If I haven't, anyone would have posted that. .

idrw not a reliable reference. And the whole article is an assumption. There is 6 month for december. All ground tests and fuel drop tanks test did in just 5 months so bvr can be tested till then

there is no delays in foc, if there then give us a link except some stupid post in tarmakblog . . I just understood last line of your post. Please elaborate rest.

. actually ada said it will create 2 td and first will roll out in 7 years. They developed four in that funds and first roll out in 8 years despite funds. And IAF changed requirement, it is IAF to be blamed for pilots died in crashes of mig21. They can have inducted tejas as soon as possible...

Self delete

Why I can't see my notification and can't like post of anyone?

no need of SAAB @Pulkit , cause 1/8 aesa radar is operational. Work on EW suit is on. Engine is there . mk1 was delayed and I gave you link why? It wasn't delayed cause just one change of wish of IAF changes whole structure which needs more time. I have already posted link about preliminary...

we are taking foreign help from israel for radar, engine is american and there is much more...... So atleast keep the design indigenous

http://hindu.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2008030958701000.htm&date=2008/03/09/&prd=th& @Pulkit this will much help you.

this article is total bs, don't take it serious bro.

may be @ersakthivel , @Kunal Biswas sir know that.