Search results

That literally what I show you earlier The dwell time increase detection range till the point we get range ambiguity, that why Velocity search is basically the mode with longest detection range At the same time, longer dwell time negatively affect scan time because it increase the time the radar...

Then you would know that what cueing basically do is reduce the huge scan time associated with long dwell time The original basics AGM-88 HARMs is purely an anti radiation missile with nothing but anti radar seeker and INS But ever since AGM-88E AARGM version, it become a multi role missile due...

You miss understand what give a radar maximum detection range. Apart from unchangeable factor that affect radar detection range such as Aperture area, another two factor which will impact radar detection range are Dwell time and transmitting power Dwell time is the time the radar spent at any...

1)Cueing reduce your scan time, it doesn't really make radar see further, and beside, ALR-67 on F-18 can also cue radar 2) agree 3)the problem however is that there is no evidence that Rafale Spectra actually better than IDECM on F-18 E/F 4) yes, but generally , a RWR almost always enjoy the...

Unless there is a massive technological disparity between the two radar such as a slotted mechanical radar compete against electronic scanned array, then aperture area is literally among the most if not the most important factor, especially on PESA and AESA since it will affect both radar gain...

Nope, DAS is an IRST capable of targeting, it is quite massively different from a MWS Firstly, aircraft tend to fly at positive AoA when near their service ceiling, so F-35 nose tend to pitch up a little bit Secondly, the height different between 2 fighter is not enough to escape EOTS vertical...

At most, Rafale is better in interceptor role since it probably climb faster, but that pretty much it. Literally everything else F-35 is better Anti radiation missile and missile in HoJ mode both home on bearing of radiation, so actually it is irrelevant whether it is an F-35 using radar to Jam...

Sure Rafale has better kinematic and better AA missile than F-18E/F but that where the advantage end. In term of sensor, F-18E/F simply much better than Rafale, there is not even a contest, F-18E/F radar aperture is bigger than Rafale one, which translate to better gain meaning longer detection...

Google translate result : " that of the mouth " ? what are you trying to say ?

Bad drawings, that about it. If Eurofighter joined Frisian flag 2008, you would have got a point. But it didn't while Rafale and F-4 did.

Here you go : F-15C with CFT and 4 AIM-7 + 4 AIM-9 Or F-15E with CFT , 4 AIM-9 , 6 CBU-89 , LANTRIN pod

F-15 can go supersonic with CFT. I can post the manual page if you like

Nonsense statement , i dont think it even necessary for me to explain why.

So how can you come to your conclusion without necessary information about how long the subsonic part is ?.

You know that 150 nm is not the total combat radius but the supersonic dash part of it right ?????

Iam serious, range wise, apart from Su-35 or F-15E with CFT.No modern fighter can compete with F-35 on internal fuel That correct but if FBW was finished, there would be no point for that test , as clearly indicated in the report what the test was for Depending on load out , F-35 may need...

That a funny one. I have saw that not just once but various time on various forum. Isn't it very strange that a retired Danish Lt. Colonel decided to write to Australian Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee about F-35 and his experiences with F-35 simulated flights ?. What could...

Nope , as stated clearly in the report , test was designed to stress the high AoA control law. There even a part talking about how the flaws control laws affect F-35 effectiveness in close combat. Yes the F-16 did carry 2 drop tank while F-35 didnot . Why ? very simple it need to extra fuel to...

Quite hilarious how you sneakily try to push those agenda despite being schooled so many time and didnt have a single word back Fact 1: the test with F-16 was a high AoA test , to test the FBW not to see which aircraft is better in dogfight. The F-16 was used as a references point for F-35...