Search results

:yey: The Good Old British vs Italian fight :yey:

:dude: We are not fighting aliens. All we need are better sensors and a better VLS for are ships

SM-6 will enable USN to do OTH engangements [They can even engage an incoming missile even though the onboard radars doesn't see the missile]

So ? You want to point out the mis-management of the project. But to tell you Indian naval projects have this same problem but in bigger magnitude.

These are rocket artillery type CIWS and are more effective against incoming cruise missiles than the conventional combos, like AK 630+Barak-1, because the missile can be launched in less time than that of VLS based missile.

Even if Chinese vessels have a SAM of 120km it doesn't matter since most naval illuminatprs don't have that kind of range. MF-STAR can detect a low flying stealthy/subsonic missile at 25+Km. So for a supersonic missile like BrahMos missile detection range would increase to about 60-70 Km...

Stop with your BS

Adelaide class warships will be replaced by 2020 when all Hobarts would have entered service. Till then Anzacs will be the most powerful warships of RAN. Especially with the CEAFAR which is yet to meet a competitor in the Indian Ocean.

Indian warships also carry imported/JV weapon systems and US DOES NOT CONTROL THE USE OF AEGIS WARSHIPS OPERATED BY OTHER NATIONS. Mate, Australian Collin class submarines use the AN/BYG-1 CCS which is amongst the most well guarded secret of USN. So What makes you think they won't give them...

Nice Joke ! :pound: Who said Aegis is comparable to MF STAR ? Some Israeli newspaper ? 500mts engagement with a VLS missile isn't helpful anyway. A system like RAM or FN 3000 is far superior for such engagements. ESSM can be quad packed mate. Prasun is a idiot, no need to trust his...

First their is no new MF STAR designed for P-15b just a better Volume Search Radar. Now comparing AMDR with Israeli radars is quite lame. Do you even know anything about SM-6 ? The new pictures of P-15b suggest just a 16 cell VLS for BrahMos 1 and another 32 cells for Barak-8ER. Compare it...

8 Harpoons + 32 SM-2 + 64 ESSM :pound: That's called firepower. Buy the time all P-15B are commissioned Hobart will have AMDR+SM-6 combo which is miles superior to anything on Indian warships.

Hobart class maybe ?

No just a lame reason. Kolkata are just overhyped destroyers. They are only good for Anti Shipping roles but fails in their primary task i.e to provide area defense to a Carrier Battle Group. Their are more powerful and heavily armed warships in Indian oceanthan Kolkata class destroyers.

Neither is MF-STAR and Barak-8

Still living in a dream land. All new chinese DDG Type 052C/D and new Type 055 are superior to Kolkata class destroyers or any upcomimg Indian destroyers. Type 054 are more of a ASW platforms than a Multi role FFGs.

Kolkata của Ấn Độ có át vía được Type-052C Trung Quốc? | soha.vn Comparison b/w Type 052C and DDG 63. Someone can translate it !!

BTW What torpedos will Kolkata carry ?

:yey: :drool: Just hand this beauty to the Navy now. They can test the weapons on some better targets like Baki junks. Arabian sea has a new price :hippo:

He took it from one of Prasun's article