Search results

They corrected it AFAIK

AIP performance is an important parameter. We are buying new generation SSK, simply we can't ingore it. Comapring MESMA with fuel cells based AIP is a complete joke. MESMA is an old tech. It makes a lot of noise while in operation. Heck! even the DRDO's AIP is better than it. Fuel Cell AIPs...

Not really, the Russian AIP performance is still unknown. It is their first try so we just can't blindly trust whatever they say. Meanwhile Amur 950 is another story !!

Every submarine in the competition is based on some existing design. So what point do you want to make ?

The S-80 would enter service by 2017. Design flaws are being corrected. S-80 has the most mordern AIP that exists as of now. Agreed that S-80 is completly untested but so is the Amur class submarines.

S-80 is better than Soryu especially its propulsion system. The Indian navy wants a next generation submarine and S-80 will provide us a platform generation ahead of our neighbours.

Hmm.. I missed this news. But I still stick with S-80 or modified Type 214.

S-1000 submarine is a dead project, especially after the Ukraine crisis. IMO we should either go with a heavily modified Type 214 [like the Type 218SG] or with the S-80 submarines.

The Australians wanted to co develop a new submarine with Japanese that would replace their Collin class subs. Not sure if Japan would replace their Soryu's with them or not but those new submarines will be a modified and a more mordern version of Soryu class submarines. Another problem with...

Japan has already started a replacement program for Soryu Class. So why do you want IN to buy decade old submarines ?

Amur class submarine with BrahMos is useless