Search results

some body please change the misleading title please. IAF is already flying with low numbers. Want two more decades to decide new fighters. So what has been getting done please complete it fast. That's what IAF wants. Rest F-18 or F5 or etc can be seen later. But current need is to replenish...

and both of them we can develop on our own.. but fighter jet not as good as them.There you lack tech. That's why other deals are easy. Similar way they are ready to do project for Navy. Because they know that we are good in it. These are small minute but very important things we should not forget.

India is not going to buy and american birds. That's for sure. These types of threads are only good for a techy discussion that's all

India does not require tot in every segment what it buy.

This has nothing to do with any good defence deal. It is just another sector where make in India plays its role and it wilm not restrict itself to US only.

TOT is what India needs and it helps India in many ways. It is not necessary that ToT happens overtly. Secondly, what ever you are saying about the aircraft Carrier deal is all random judgment and no one is heard anything about negotiation so we will keep that aside. The day it is launched...

No country will give you their critical technology. What they will give is something to produce under license with restrictions. Gorshkov delay and price rise most probably happened due to incapable bureaucracy of India. Navy demands something, defence ministry is against.. files kept aside in...

a jet which can run on bio fuels. Then you will have a new type of propulsion system different from the current one. India needs heavily to spend money on jet engine technology. Which can be actually realized and upgraded. Americans or any country will never give India jet engine technology...

comparing brahmos which can kill the new aircraft career is not a good comparison. Both are different technologies. What is so critical about building A/C with americans? The americans know that India has achieved the capability to construct world class vessels. Hence they have not yet closed...

yes because you need to keep them happy to back us in UNSC and counter China. Not because they are giving us free lunch of ToT and without any norms.

T-90 is a mess? .................................................... Life cycle cost is doing absolutely fine. We should not buy costly arms which require half of the defence budget just for maintenance and without ToT. It's just good for seller not good for buyer.

Their cost price is okay but what GOI looks is not just cost but maintenance cost and how it will react to Indian climate. We go for Russian technology not just because they give us technology (many times) but it is best suitable for Indian climate. Other technologies are too sensitive to...

slowly the world is coming out of 4th and 4.5 gen fighters why forcing India to buy them? We need to understand that going for these machines will not help us in our own industry. Secondly when India has stuck to French then why to become confused and swing like pendulum? Better to invest...