Search results

O Bhai, what happens if Navy and AF personnel have to fight on ground? It's a very common occurrence. They won't have advantage of tech all the time.

Yeah, all it comes down to is that why should the taxpayer have to bear burden of raising sub standard soldiers when better ones can be trained. Not going into the other points for now.

Yeah, where were these women armies and what was the result of battle?

Worse, it's going to become a liability. Governments can't or shouldn't go to war over loss of few men. It is a very sad fact but war can't start over a Capt. Kalia or Abhinandan. I'm not trying to minimise sacrifice but saying GoIs can't go to war involving billions over deaths of a few. But...

Yeah, if we aren't angling for unfit men to be soldiers, why women? Why spend national resources on a sub standard soldier? I do not care if even trans people get in army if they can pass the physicals.

Yeah, and everyone complains about them. Those are photo ops.

The "you" you are referring to isn't the same. You were replying to someone else. Yeah, so if you're aware how 'fake men' started crying about Abhinandan, you're telling me it'll be magically better if a woman is captured and raped on video? Right. Sure the ones joining have steeled...

My question to you is simple, did we have to lower physical standards for women or did we keep it the same as men? Are we really going to pretend we don't have to have women only versions of sports and that school kids don't repeatedly beat national level sportswomen teams?