Search results

wait ! let others jump in ..You three have to explain it again and again...

Hmmm....agreed with DD, Soham and Yousuf.......putting down my gun..

:rofl: the way you said it...as if I am really throwing nukes like darts to pakistan.

Its about preventing the one that is bent to come and save lives. striking a larger area where you are anticipating the missile is going to be lunched from is more dependable than putting your bet on a ABM. What will happen next can be thought. But first you have to take on the first one.

in that case we will have confirmed excuse to throw what we have.

reviewing no first use policy will be a stronger detterent than present one.

still it cant give 100% gurantee. May be in future something will be developped to protect a country totally from any hostile projectile. But with current technology risk will always be there.

other side of the coin means death of millions.... who is ready to gamble?

first one and third one cant give any assurance. second one impossible (we cant give roof over the head of all our citizens) fourth one we have. But what about the life of your fellow countrymen who are going to be slaughtered. If you know your enemy is preparing to nuke you it is more...

my question is what India should do when enemy nuke strike is imminent.

Just imagine a situation. India is in war against her hostile neighbour. And the news has come that the neighbour continuously beaten conventionally arrenging to nuke India. What should India do? It will lunch its nuclear missile before the enemy to save millions of Indians or it will stick with...