Search results

Super what are they and where were they taken? :) STGN

great what is hull width, hull length, track width, are the turret sides parralel with the the hull sides is the front of the turret roof sloped. overall turret width, width of cmd hatch If you know the numbers please give them I mean you could finish all arguments and prove DRDO numbers...

Oh what do you know wrong again: What is it you say? oh yeah "you can't argue with this". Off cause this photo will not stop all trolling unfortunately :( STGN

You can't even see the pivot point so you are just guessing the length. Please man give it up. You are wrong you know it but you are a coward and can't admit it so you keep on this crazy fantasy campaign making up numbers to seemingly make the turret front 3.2m we show you wrong and wrong...

Look in the drawing you measure the 50cm height from the pivot point to the top of the hatch, but in the pictures you measure it from the top edge to the bottom edge of the hatch but you don't go down to the pivot point. You can't even see the pivot point in that photo. Bravo, bravo! classic...

One problem with that drawing is that the length between those lines is incorrect it is not 10.64m more like 10.22m at least if we scale by the outside of the roadwheels which have a 66cm diameter. The line following the ground where the track pads stands, has the correct length of 10:64 if we...

What are you taking about? that was not what I was replying too. Stop changing the argument when you can't defend your outrageous claims. besides I have just showed how your estimation can't be true a few posts ago the picture is distortet and at an angle so the turret front height to width...

What? No it dosen't compensate that is an outrageous claim that makes NO sence at all. The cutout at the rear does not alter the distance at the front. STGN

STGN

STGN

Oh you mean like you arbitrary selecting lines that go across the front of the turret and give vaguely fantasy fitting numbers. I clearly used no 105 mm prototype, not sure I even used any prototypes in the photos? and if I did then its surpricing how they all fit so well together its almost...

You stating this only shows that you have no Idea about what you speak, I mean this is on the level of "gunner sitting in front of the mantel". And you complain about not using correct plane perspective and stuff and then you do this, its hilarious ROTFL literally. STGN

STGN

Well look at the lines, then look at where he drew his lines, his method is clearly wrong as he tries to determine height of the turret storage box and then use that height as the height of the front turret. there is already a huge number of errors in his method but leave those aside. He then...

STGN

Okay fair enough I will not debate you. For the record I have not taken an entrenched position, I have changed my position several times already and will do again if evidence changes. STGN

I understand what you are saying, you however make a mistake here the median(average) face is only 14,5cm wide. 95th percentile does not mean that 95% of men have a 15.5cm wide head rather it means that 95 percent of men have a smaller face than 15.5. so 4x14,5 = 58 before factoring in...

I will try to explain a last time. The white lines are use to out line the hull and to find out the angel to which the hull has turned relative to the turret so I can draw a line as straight across the hull as possible.it also points out that the armor skirts on this ARJUN model don't have the...

No its not look at a picture of the side of a ARJUN the hatches are just in front of the second hinge after the armor skirts. also where did 3875 come from? You can look at the picture to see where I did my pixel measurement. I scaled it by using the distance from the rear of the turret going...

Well you didn't say that was your personal belief but you did say that is what you calculation did which is true which is why it is incorrect to use. Which is what I was talking about so stop trying to change the subject. Really where did you say that?: Where did I misquote you? In other...