Search results

Even the Russian planes we few are in better condition than the one maintained by Russian Airforce.

Let them Cope

“it's a bird! It's a plane! Yes, it's Mk1A!”

Its our problem that we have made such basic thing as sign of Pride. As other members already mentioned, we don't know how to handle accidents and crashes here.

All international partners would do similar things to claim their part worked well in case of such crashes.

Its good only then. If we are able to get them at good bargain, then nothing wrong.

If available at dirt cheap prices, then why not. But if they charge a bomb or like a fresh new plane then get over it.

Jhopadi walo! Yeh discussion chitchat thread par karlo! Jab decide ho jaye kaun 4th gen hai, kaun 5th and kaun 3rd tab yahan aana.

Talks pe talks! Talks pe Talks! Talks pe talks talks to bahut ho gyi Chairman sab par order nahi mila!

We have a new Ugra Bhairav now! Original one is for Politics thread and this new one - @Samej Jangir for Arms and equipment threads!

1000 mk2 are just too much for to produce and maintain. Gonna cost us a lot! US can and will produce on large scale, they have might and money to do so!

Jalte ho tum JF17 ki success se

Checkmate india

Dude, Soviets were not 100 times Russian. After WWII, soviets managed to build most no of Mig-17, Mig-21 and Mig-23. Mig-17 and Mig-21 both more than 10000 units and Mig-23 less than 5000. Rest all are much less in no. Even on its highest point Soviet Union GDP managed to reach only ~58% of...

Doesn't Look shoddy at all. Aircrafts looks cool from a distance but go near it; will give you view of uneven surfaces and bolts and all.

I posted one of his tweet here also only to find it was fake!

He did used to post fake snaps of projects. Many times posted fake claims.

Brits still had much heavier punch. They had experience of 2 WW and better Navy in general. Argentines still gave them good fight initially.