Search results

Just because Hitler misappropriated the term Aryan, suddenly it makes him right? I never said I believe in the original conception of AIT. All I've said is that there's been migration in and out (mostly in) and that Jats look different from Tamils , on average because they have different...

I'm being very nice. You should reciprocate. It's very prole and low class to call names. Phenotypic patterns across populations are certainly indicative of genotypic patterns. If Mendel saw a field full of tall plants beside one that has mostly short plants, he'd conclude that on average the...

I've also not stated that AIT is proven beyond doubt. It's not. I'm only asserting that there has been a lot of migration into the Indian subcontinent. And again, Tamils are genetically different from Jats. There's a lot of admixture data to back up my claims. Go on harappadna.org and check...

Tamil brahmins have similar admixture as North Indian dalits because even though they are brahmins, they mixed with lower caste natives when they migrated south. It's a pretty simple explanation. I've never said I have European ancestry. I am however noticeably genetically different from you...

Your looks are coded for by your genes. It's obvious that people who look closer to Caucasians are on average more similar genetically to them as well. If you don't understand that you're a moron. NW Indians look closer to Europeans than Tamils. Therefore, NW Indians are genetically closer to...

The reverse is ruled out. Europeans don't have mtDNA M. They also don't have the most common indigenous Indian y-DNA H. There is plenty of other evidence. You shouldn't really conflate this stuff with linguistic categories. Dravidian is a linguistic family. The Brahui speak a Dravidian language...

Get yourself genotyped. I guarantee you that your admixture profile looks pretty different from a Jatt's. You probably have maternal haplogroup M and paternal haplogroup H. A Jatt might have y-DNA R1a1a and mt-DNA Ux. And you autosomal profiles will differ. It's no coincidence that NW Indians...

Blah blah... Toothless ad-hominem attacks. Explain to me why maternal haplogroup M is only found in India and conspicuously absent from Europe, Middle East, Central Asia, etc... And how come Indian paternal haplogroup H is most common among lower castes/tribes and South Indians? In upper...

Stop politicizing science. It's not right.