Search results

And they are right. USA annexed lands from Mexico. And how wondefully Mexicans are treated as paragons of peace and self respect around the world- because they don't retake their lands? BTW, the comparison itself is pathetic because if mexico had a military of India and USA had a military of...

Oh come on. If you have arguments against my claims, post them . calling me a Hindu basher is not going to negate my claims. I want to see if Americans would have waited this long, sucking Mexican ****s if Mexico was occupying land which legally belonds to USA all the while Mexicans kill...

Yes. This is because most Hindus are pussies still living with lack of self respect. This is why they are voting in a govt which has no interest in taking back PoK. I am pretty sure that they will give the same retarded excuse they gave for India ceding land to Bangladesh. Pathetic really I...

Excuses after excuses and that too very weak ones. Of course USSR could not have brought the fleet slowly to Arabian sea to defend India and its not like we could have attacked Pakistan after the fleets have been positioned right? Hell considering the close proximity of USSR TO India and the...

How the soviet ships entered bay of Bengal in 1971? By magic?

Again dude, don't bring in the Americans unless you bring in the Russians . And no, taking back PoK with an Army the four times as powerful should not have been difficult. If it was, it means only one thing- incompetence. It wouldnt be stretched thin if India too was involved with its full...

Pakistan's higher GDP per capita would have meant jack since it does not make any meaningful influence on their total military spending. And Indian involvement would have had full backing of the Soviets just like the american involvement in the Pak, neutralising American help to Pak. And pak...

Was Pakistan's economy at that time at a position to take on India? Again, this is just an excuse, a useless one at that.

It is only so because of the leftist education. It will change in the coming years . Some % of humans are always self respect lacking , and so they will always be there. But the rest will see the world for what it is and we might actually have a govt with a back bone to take back what is ours.

That will turn us into Pakistan which will be worse. What we need is self awareness among Hindus.

To be frank RSS and BJP are incompetent as fuck. We voted for a marginally better party in 2014, not the party which we should ideally have

The correct question is, do we have the correct people inhabiting in India who can vote in a govt which can take back PoK?

How long is our impotency going to last and allows pakis to use terrorism? We have to take a stand sooner or later.

Nope, it indicates lack of will/cajones/balls. And also the dhimmitude of Indians /Hindus in general.

Are you now giving reasons as to why we should not take back PoK? :puke:

And retaking our rightful part was never on the cards indicates what exactly. And who cares it takes forever to mobilise the army. Will the same excuse be used if pakis attacked -" since it took forever to mobilise , we are not gonna fight them back".

That's not what I asked. I asked what stopped India from taking back PoK during the 2000s? There was no reason to wait then and intact pakis had not even mobilised their nukes then. We could have used parliament attacks as an excuse. There was no reason to wait then and there was every reason to...

But that doesn't explain all the years India dint. Was splitting Baluchistan always on the cards or is it just an useful excuse found today to hide our impotence? I don't remember India doing anything on Balochistan in the 2000s

Isn't it at work right now. What stops us from retaking PoK now? Is future going to be any better