Search results

  1. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    I would say we need 15-16carriers to match USN. And as some one said- subs - sea denial, carrier- sea dominance and force projection
  2. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    Yes, surprise the enemy and then twiddle the thumb :dude:
  3. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    You spy on your enemy and then what? Twiddle our thumbs? I can't believe you guys are advocating for subs vs AC when you have China next door.
  4. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    You are right, but nothing is scarier than a couple of CBG docked outside blockading your ports. Subs can never provide force projection. AC on the other hand....
  5. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    And Indian govt is somehow going to be powerlfull to use nukes? Seriously, if you are going to bring in the spines of Indian govt, aircraft carrier means a much more. Maldives would not happen again if we have had two CBG on call near them
  6. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    We can't have an Indian lake with sub's alone. We need a massive AC fleet for that
  7. Mad Indian

    Indian Aircraft carriers are sitting ducks against most of today's weapons

    Cost comparison for nuclear sub vs carriers is probably the stupidest argument anyone can make - Hey ,the cars cost a million times less than carriers. So lets build million cars instead of a carrier :rolleyes:.
Top