Search results

  1. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Sorry sir but there is some logic to this madness. 1) Type 001A is a national project (chinese radar and most likely a chinese engine with an aircraft complement that ensures that they cannot be blackmailed in wartimes). Vikrant is an import opportunity laying ground for further imports. Be it...
  2. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    vipulmb.blogspot.in/2014/09/exclusive-pictures-aircraft-carrier-ins.html Will begin to look like this. The pics are too big so not posting here.
  3. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Anyways SM-3 is useless: http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/sm-3/ And here is what the NPA walas think about similar things when Indians say something about something that has bearing on these things: https://fas.org/blogs/security/2013/10/indianmirv/ From the comments section you...
  4. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Bahut dard ho raha hai USA ke liye. :) But then what is good for the goose/US is good for the gander/India. And the 2 countries who have handed over nukes to Pakis and 'early version of DF-21' to Saudi Arapia, could get imaginative. Nahi kya? But it really is funny with you guys. Kitana pyar...
  5. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    See the following kind of bravado is easily perceived as empty: FYI merely the kinetic force from a Ballistic RV will render the AC mission killed absolutely and properly. From the size of warhead a DF-21D carries and the speed with which it is claimed to be travelling, I would suspect (a...
  6. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Will you guys say the threat exists only after the US Navy says so? That puts you in risk of being a camp follower. I hope you guys realize that. Anyhow the US analysts and Navy too had reacted like that initially when some of their own raised the panic. That syndrome is called "ASBM Denial"...
  7. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Wow the discussion seems to have moved quite a bit. What gets detected gets targeted too. There is no way a CBG will not be detected, triangulated and targeted from a combination of Satellites, planes, Subs and Ships. Missile does not have to pick up the CBG by the electronic noise it creates...
  8. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    That is one of the reasons we can be sure that India will be able to mount a serious challenge to any CBG. But then I assure you when I mentioned the DF-21D it was not meant as a fanboy vs fanboy cat fight. My working presumption is that whatever is currently being done in missile development...
  9. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    I accept my defeat against 'most' :p. FYI, 1) Shaurya and hypersonic cruise will never be able to give the leg up that Ballistics can. 2) All the relevant Chinese signals have been picked up properly by people who matter - US Intel and Indian Intel. India has already started working along...
  10. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    Why? Do the researchers, Navies of China, India, US, Russia and perhaps later on Japan agree with your assessment? Not to forget lawmakers in US.
  11. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    http://aviationweek.com/blog/navweek-ballistic-bombast They just want our people to do their bidding. They have seen the chinese written on the wall and so they cannot risk their floating targets. That is more than the entire capital budget of all three armed forces branches of India...
  12. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    @rojo Great report. Several important points. <snip> <snip> <snip> See chimes in well with what the Americans themselves are doing. But there fanboys would have none of it. If Americans have it then we must beg the americans and even become their 'allies' aka...
  13. Khagesh

    INS Vikrant Aircraft Carrier (IAC)

    US aircraft carrier Nimitz Class Not stated which Aircraft Carrier
Top