Search results

Know that, without an emergency like a WW3 where India's capital gets gets destroyed, capital won't move in this century or even in next century. Buildings are being designed for requirements of 150 years and will even survive longer in architectural terms.

No, capital is better a small, rich and efficient city with low population and not an economic backbone. Why? See protests.

Archaeological evidence is sufficient to verify it's existence. Indraprasth's existence is a much much older instance than that of Ujjain or Vijaynagar. Since it was possibly invaded and ruined by foreigners, it doesn't standstill like many old cities today. I don't have any great admiration for...

Ever heard of Indraprastha?