Search results

That really doesn't build up the case here. In either of above cases, there is absolutely zero original thing which wouldn't happen with a large state like China regardless of Mao. All major states pushed for industrialisation soon after WW2, pushed for nukes. Only thing without Mao would be...

So is modern China which isn't even remotely communist. China would have been a backward society if not a sub-Saharan style shithole till date if Deng wasn't there. Communism just doesn't work in real world. It's just a pleasant hangover music for emotional motivation.

We can't forward our arguments without logics. There is no logic involved in what you said. Instead you quote what you like & is popular. May be, still this thread isn't needed. It's again the pathetic media. None of actions reflect the "perception" of a western street reporter. At least...

Besides nationalism, Mao was China's Nehru, in even worse form. Deng was the one who changed their destiny. Seems that its too tough to shove this up in your mind that lighter missile doesn't mean its more advanced. India has been trying to increase throw weight in attempt to boost payload...

No, its around 50 tonnes & payload too matters. India BTW is working on increasing throw weight of existing missile systems rather than increasing their range.

What newspapers say don't have any meaning at first place. Dumbo journos know nothing about complexity of existing and in concept launch, docking & berthing systems and the long term objectives of countries. If you are only going to use that "American, Russian, European or Chinese newspaper said...

But it isn't better than Chinese missiles of all categories.

This thread is a piece of $hit. There is no race between China & India, no matter whatever fanboys fart. China doesn't see India as an actual but theoretical potential rival and will try to maintain status quo. India's goals aren't US or China centric. So you started applying pakis logic? Do...

When? No, they got from US when they turned against Soviets. Their early missiles were very primitive and poor. No, we had French systems modified. France was only P5 country that was even supportive India's nuclear program openly. So is China. We tried something 50 years later. So, we'll...

All I'm saying is, stop making it China vs India.

The content of thread is stupid. India was supposed to get dehyphenated from the conventionally cited adversary Pakistan, does not mean to get hyphenated with another i.e. China. For animosities, China has issues with first world for atrocities and Indians are supposed to hate Britons for that...