Search results

So show me a source that agrees with what you said. Else the only conclusion is, you just made things up. And answer my question- why would i stop you from buying my product and then help you develop a competitor to my product ?

Why would i stop you from buying my car and then help you develop your own car ? Xi's visit to Biden is irrelevant to what happened in the 70s and 80s. Its a matter of fact that France opposed Israel and cancelled military cooperation with Israel in 1967. Dassault helping Israel would be high...

Embargoes most certainly does forbid helping the embargoed nation with military design. Again, you dont cancel a deal where you make $$ and then help the guy you cancelled deal with, to develop a competitor for your product. Thats literally insane. J10's aspect similarity with the F35 is due to...

No. Lavi design is independent design since France is on open record to've embargoed Israel's military deals with France. This is as stupid as saying the Americans helped China make the J-20.

Irrelevant. Hillary Clinton is irrelevant to Israel- France, especially in the 70s and 80s. Whats fact is France embargoed Israel's order of Mirage V in 1967 and Israel designed the Lavi as a response. Thats a matter of open record. Hence you are wrong.

France embargoed Israel's Mirage V orders in 1967 and cancelled them. This is a matter of open record and has already been cited. Which is why Israeli agents stole the design and made the Kfir and Nesher. You cannot pick a design from a plane that is YOUNGER than you. As i said, stop making...

Israel did not consult Dassault for Lavi design. It was under embargo from France and France cancelled its Mirage F4 deal with Israel is why Israel developed the Lavi. Stop making up stuff like a typical CCP agent.

They consulted Dassault you mean. Rafale is the plane, Dassault is the manufacturer. And no, Israel didn't consult Dassault. The entire reason Israel built the Lavi is because its Mirage deal got embargoed by France. One doesn't prevent you from buying one's product only to help you develop...

No. Lavi's design is earlier than Rafale's, its design got frozen before the Rafale even had its first test flight. There is no Rafale involved in the J10. None, nada, zip.

Except France didnt transfer tech to China. Israel did, as my citation shows. You already admitted that the J-10 'early' design is based on the Lavi. Since there is no such thing as modifying the design of airframe/engine in later designs on any fighter jet ever, it means J10 is based on the Lavi.

No, i can see that the J-10 is clone of the Lavi. Rafale wasnt even in prototype production in the 80s. It only had ONE plane built by 1990 as a tech demonstrator, with its design not frozen till 1988.

No. This is not how it works. A plane's engine, aerodynamics & frame design does NOT undergo change. Only avionics and the electronics does. The F-16 block A & block F have the exact same airframe, aerodynamic capacity and engine. A plane is designed first and foremost with the engine in mind...

Here you go, citation: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/why-china-looked-israels-lavi-jet-its-j-10-vigorous-dragon-160931

Lavi was built but not comissioned. J-10 is a lavi clone. It had no avenue for influence via Rafale, which was still under development and hadn't flown a test flight in the 80s. We know that Lavi is a F-16 derivate & J-10 is a lavi clone. So obviously its gonna share characteristics with the F-10.

No, it isnt. J-10 is a Lavi copy. Lavi's canards and J-10's canards are virtually identical in placement, Lavi was a single engine plane too. As i said, there is record of Israel selling the lavi design to the chinese.

Tibet never volunteered to be a province of PRC. And it will be liberated by us in this millenia.

No, There is open record of Israel selling to China its research on Lavi, of which J-10 is a clone of.

Tell us who burnt down parts of the forbidden palace please. Chinese people have very little self respect for their own culture.