Search results

Although I am not a Brahmin nor i had any intention to defend Brahmanism. But somehow i started defending because of false accusation. I don't know why people always blame Brahmanism for Islamic Invasion, discrimination and problem within Hinduism. I have seen accusation at many sites. They...

Every ideology is great ideology if it helps the community and nation. Comparing Sikhims with Brahminical ? :facepalm: You keep changing the points in every post. I have already said, Brahmanism ideology was more successful than failure and i am not going to say again and again. I don't...

Hindi nationalism ? Don't know about that. I heard this on DFI mainly. Hindu nationalism - May be at times (it's my personal choice and i am proud of it :)). Indian nationalism - certainly any time. I have right to criticize anything which i don't feel right and against my religion in...

. No, I proved Brahmanism ideology was not crap but it was good for the nation in many ways. bad also in some way. They are not responsible for Invasion and protection for every individual. Brahman is just a cast like 1,000 others. Still, SC,ST, Brahmins didn't converted so Hinduism survived...

Political party has nothing to do with Nationalist and Secularist people. Don't worry it's never going to happen. It didn't happened in 800 years and now happening when nationalism is rising ?? :rofl: Buddhist flourish.....I don't have problem. Good. Rest, No...... Cry me river still...

Well, You have a valid point and I am sure, All were not same. But difficult to change perception as hatred is deeply rooted against them. There is genuine hatred against them because every 3rd Muslims ancestors were from Hinduism. Country was divided. Religious temples, monuments were...

:facepalm: There is some reason why you used your userID is "I am idiot" 20% converted till 17th century. After that 20% become 33% due to High Total Ferlity Rate. Even Muslims were around 25% in 1940's in undivided India. Today 33% because Muslim T.F.R. is almost 50% higher than...

During Medieval period, Most of the richest/strong cast were Rajputs, Jats, Khatris, Gujjars, Jat, etc. - Mostly they converted into Islam for various reason. 90% SC, ST, Brahmin didn't converted Islam during 800 years of rule. Today, SC + ST + Brahmin makes 30%+ population of the whole...

Yes, Brahmanism was successful because 80% Indians didn't converted into Islam during 800 years of rule. 20% in 800 years that also no. grew by each passing decade due to TFR ? Islam were successful in many ways because there was no unity on NW & Eastern front. That's it. Nothing to do with...

All Muslim Invaders were bastards. Akbar is debatable. I hate British also but not in same way compare with Islamic invaders. They came to expand Islam. Converted people, Killed, Destroyed thousands of religious Temples Libraries, Scriptures. Brahmanism may be wrong in casteism but at...

Of course, Wealth is always the reason. But one important motto was "spread of Islam". Aurengzeb didn't killed Hindus and destroyed temple for wealth. Library of takshila to Nalanda was noty burnt for wealth. Rajputs were not forced to convert for the sake of wealth. You are biased with your...

Ideology rises if people support. It fails, if people oppose. Simple !! Why to blame anyone, if people supported ?? There must be some valid reason. People believed in Brahmanic ideology, So it was successful. Well, if it divided the society. Then i don't think Hinduism could have survived...

Yes. But all these invaders were not brutal nor powerful like Islamic invaders. Also, They didn't came to spread any particular religion. So, That didn't not make any major difference. Even many Sakas settled in NW region which can be traced in clans of Rajputs of Rajasthan. But that does not...

No, they were not. They were follower of Tengriism. (Shamanism)

LOL. Islam started in 6th century only. There was no such threat to religion pre-7th century. Buddhist were not Warriors across the globe. Even Tibetans were warriors before they adopted Buddhism. Read history.

It's good that Buddhism didn't spread all over India population wise. They were peaceful people and failed to protect their own religious places. They lost in A'than with no resilient. If India majority population would be Buddhist in medieval period, Whole undivided India would have become...

Well, I said......we lost huge chunk of land and population % wise. It's unforgettable pain. But we can't change the history. Unfortunately, We have to live with that for rest of our life. On satisfactory note, I am still living in place which was ruled by Mughals Sulatants for few hundred...

Hindus were successful. 800 years of Islamic invasion, but failed to convert India into Islamic state. Only 20% population converted that also mainly OBC + Rajputs, Jats. Now, Population is 33% because of High Total fertility rate. They were fully successful in countries like Egypt, Persia...

Well, India was ONE single entity during Mauryas and Guptas. Brahmin was just a cast and not sole responsible for everything. By this way, we can blame Sindhi Hindus, Khatris Punjabis, Rajputs and Jats more. They failed to protect and converted into large no. too. The crusaders ?? Europe also...

According to latest census report, Hindu Dalits are 21% in U.P. Muslim Dalits are 0.6% in U.P. (Total Muslim population 18%-19%) Brahmins are 12% in U.P., Muslim Brahmin (as per clan) are not even 1% in U.P. Jats, Gujjars, Rajputs and other OBC/MBC makes 90% Muslim population in U.P. Same...