Search results

Why wouldn't they ? They have provided us with several capabilities like Romeo for Navy or P-8I . This fighter jet deal means a lot to them. All they seek is an entry and cut down a customer of Russian defence. Anyway, a Lite version was unveiled targeting us...

Growler is on offer.

In Ladakh. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/nation/current-affairs/220720/20-navy-mig-29s-moved-to-ladakh.html

You will need them for interception and 20 are already there anyway. Offensive or defensive is all a words play. Even if we launch a Nuke at China I consider it defensive mindset since china is already an aggressor and have occupied my/ours land.

The second carrier need aircrafts ... If they go for Rafale then you are right there will not be much fund left. But if it is hornet they may replace mig 29 k too. Tedbf if funded can match the MWF timeline as engine avionics radar cockpit etc are already finalised. So in both cases mig 29 k...

Instead of coastal air bases Airforce will benefit more specifically in the air bases situated in mountain region like laddakh which have short strip for land and takeoff. Navy should instead go for more Jags in maritime patrol role with higher thrust engines. They are pretty reliable birds in...

In every way possible in comparison to Typhoon it is better.

Its maintenance issues are the real reason airframe life isn't great either. By 2030 IN wish to retire them though highly unlikely now with the budget constraint. Even if they do retire them IAF can definitely use them. Apparently Naval Mig 29k are used from Ladakh airbase now. IAF should go...

Rafale is a better option for the price we pay.

Why are they wasting theirs and others time. No To USA for IAF unless it's F-35. After going for Rafale I doubt IAF will go for another type khichdi mess.