Search results

Does this statement of yours holds true for every NATO member in an arms deal with Russia or for Turkey only?

While there is no proof, it is not an unreasonable speculation that the S400 deal involves TOT, considering the fact that even Turkey, which is spending less that 40% of the amount spent by us on S400, is getting TOT. Obviously things will get clearer in future.

You are talking to a moron. Just 5 posts ago he was claiming that s400, barak 8, akash are all similar

Dude you are simply trying to change the topic when I called you out for putting words in my mouth. Someone with a spine would have accepted his fault and moved on, but you are just a coward. My last post on the topic. I will not reply to you now even if you do. Yes you definitely got me when...

Changing the topic again when I pointed out your mistake? Anyways, as I said, the US systems are about 6 times more costly than s400 as per some estimates. So if s400 is overpriced, idk what patriot is.

Spinning words again as usual despite me specifically asking you not to. Show me where did I say that S400 will fire at AWACS at a range of 380 km or apologize for lying. No point in engaging you otherwise.

Your source contradicts you. As again, you never read. No wonder you have so many comprehension issues. As per your source: The rider clause prevents Russia from selling the S-400 Missile System or any similar or advance Air Defence System to Pakistan under any circumstances. So clause is...

Atleast I am not throwing stuff out of my a$$ unlike you. And please tell me where did I say that s400 will fire at the aircraft at a range of 380 km? Please show it, don't try to spin the words again like you have been doing till now.

Good. Now that you have accepted that Russia already sells weapons to Pakistan and India protested about it, you should now go back and correct your other mistakes as well.

Stupidity has no cure. The 40N6 is an extremely long range, hypersonic, Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) designed to engage low maneuverable aerodynamic targets at ranges of up to 400 kilometers. The new missile is the weapon of choice against Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft...

OMG this is so funny. Can you please stop embarrassing yourself? Yes Russia does exports weapons to Pakistan. Its JF 17 uses the Russian RD93 engine. Russians also have recently exported Mi35 to Pakistan. Its a free world.

You should read it yourself properly and understand it. NATO is not in conflict with Russia. This is exactly why NATO has taken no action again S400 purchase. America is unilaterally trying to bully turkey using the F35 program and CAATSA.

As I said, you need to do some basic research. S400's 40N6E missile's range is 380 km. Barak 8's range is 70 km. In which world are they comparable? Akash's range is 30 km. Comparing it with S400 is a joke. Patriot systems are about 6 times costly as compared to S400 as per some estimates...

Yes i do. How is it relevant to the discussion? Why don't you answer my questions instead of spinning the topic?

Its range. It allows us to take down Pakistani aircraft within their territory. It is the second line of air defence after the BMD. Systems operational or in development in india are not in class of S400. Lot of systems are not war proven including barak 8, brahmos, etc. Doesn't make it a wrong...

We have no projects comparable to S400. Some basic research will tell you this.

Dude where did you get this? Where does it say that a NATO member cannot buy weapons from outside? What NATO treaty are they violating? If they really are, why is no one holding them up for violation of so called "NATO treaty"? Why is US targetting them through CAATSA instead?

Russian missiles with India are also 20 years old, so comparison there. Anyways I think our independent foreign policy will give us good returns in long term. And yes, there is something like being a US slave and it does impact us. Just look at US treatment of turkey after their decision to...