Search results

That won't be too big of a deal breaker if they choose to go with a bustle mounted autoloader instead of the usual carousel. But yeah, 120mm would have been the better choice, no two ways about it.

Hmmm.... can't they just build a wider turret?? Yeah, I'll try to remember the name of that book.

T-14 is stumbling due to budgetary issues more than anything else. And there is no need to mount a carousel autoloader when you could always go for a bustle mounted one. Wet stowage doesn't work, at least not in the way you think it does. It was found in after-war inspections and tests that...

I don't believe C4 can be used as propellant charge material as it's a type of high explosive, but there are less energetic propellant charges available now. So yeah, what you propose does have its merits. But where's the need for that when you can simply go with an unmanned turret??

Honestly, the practice of stowing ammo in the hull should be dispensed with completely (unless they go for a carousel type design like that of the T-14).

Although it seems promising, at least on paper, their track record with ground vehicles does not inspire much confidence.

Good luck with that one. And the design of the hull front should be changed to something more in line with that of the Leclerc.

Well, not if their own design is a complete clusterfuck which happens to be the case with 'Arjun'.

Dude!!Where the hell have you been, bro??!!