Search results

i would suggest increase British AID to India we will consider:):):):biggrin2::biggrin2:

Apart from that operating cost ,avionics and versatility also big factor

well iam not in mood of farting especially after 5 pegs of vodka...

3BRD is repair depot of choppers like MI-8,17,26

is he in 3BRD???? coz they repair all choppers

truth is bitter. but truth is truth. iam from Chandigarh. and these fat ass are based in Chd. My uncle was in 3BRD depot. He himself admitted that Mi-26 is white elephant. it has more maintenance issue than efficiency. and IAF could not used this fat ass fully for this shit was bought.

i love u on this

C-130 can perform better than this shit hole in LEH. air force has accepted .. its better u must also accepted that

twin rotor is always better and stable than single rotor. chinoook has proven more in war front than MI-26. we had MI-26 for the last 25 yrs. we had problem with its spares and high cost of operation. we should now take tried and tested machine which is also cost efficient chinook paindabad...

topic is chinook VS MI -26 not MI-17:frusty::frusty::rolleyes::rolleyes: now accept MI-26 can not do what chinook can do

No man good example to attempt sarcasm will be "GO FOR JF-17 MAN"

go for chinook man

good example of chinnook stability and versatility . MI-26 can noooooooot do this man

Besides maneuverability, engine power also important. Engine must perform good in thin air of Himalaya altitude

Buy JF -17:lol::rofl::laugh::laugh::laugh::taunt1::pound::pound:

Chinook is all time better than MI-26 in all aspect. there is no need to be bullied