Search results

All over the world people who use AK family are idiiots and all those armies who threw back INSAS at India are also idiots.. leave aside Indian Forces. You are the only wise man left on earth..... Armchair you siad. I wish I could put you in front of a Pakistani terrorist having a UBGL attached...

Hello, Is Dhanush a lightweight 155mm How system....??? I thought is 13 tons heavy ???? Punj Lyod is a financial sick joint and the very survivability of the company is under serious doubts...

All troops in J&K, NE, AR, CPOs in COIN, RPF, SFs etc have weapons that fire 7.62X39 bullets. Their number is larger than many Armies in the world. I am aware that OFB has started manufacturing 7.62X39 but how was asking whether that is sufficient or we are still importing that ammunition.

Most of the troops in India are using AK-47. Problem is whether we are producing any ammunition for it (7.62X39) in the numbers required ?

Still you import following ammunition : Carts 9 mm Ball Carts 7.62 MM Steel Core Bullets Carts SA 7.62 MM B- 32 Carts 7.72 MM T-46 12.7 HE (Ball) 7.62 Sniper Amn

But the question is when will that banana fall from the tree ? and who will manufacture it ?

Keep trying .. by that time a new technology would have swept the markets.. that is the problem..

The OFB, DRDO and above all MoD will not allow any desi company to take away their bread and their captive market !

A recent report from CRPF as I have quoted elsewhere in this thread also have the same complaints by CRPF except cold arrest. They instead have hot arrest or combat arrest. By and large, the Indian 5.56 INSAS as a system is not being accepted by troops for CI operations. Even the US troops in...

rightly said.. OFB weapons do not meet the tactical requirement of the forces ... that is what every one has been saying ... this what the "jhagra" is !!

CRPF deployed in Red zones will get AK-47s CRPF deployed in Red zones will get AK-47s Now CRPF is also ditching desi mal .... ?? There has to be reason as explained in the article.. What is interesting is the number of AKs per battalion - it means they do not visualise the entire battalion...

It seems you all gentlemen have never fired under real operational conditions : Firing when tons of artillery shell are bursting on top of you .. and splinters are shirking all around. The staccato and noise of combat forces your head down... Firing when your bunker is taking direct...

US has no DPSUs and DODOs nor do they have ingenious fever gripping them fatally. They worry more of their economics.

The purpose of having a multi bore/ barrel rifle is at be able to fire many calibre of ammunition from a single platform. But not in a single operation or in similar operational environment. This situation has arisen the world over since specific calibre or effect requirements have arisen for...

Indian problem like the Chinese ones is not design but the production... design may be good but production standards let down a good design. Same is the case China..... they all want cheap goods.

Nimo, F-INSAS means Futuristic Infantry Soldier As a System. INSAS, meaning Infantry Small Arms system has not come up so far as a family of small Arms sytem but only as a rifle. Indian Army perhaps is looking for a calibre which can be adopted from pistol to GPMG and a rifle that can be...

Sorry folks, the vidieo link is this: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IPS-Bllcrg] Just see the weapons in the hands of the US troops.

When it comes to real combat the soldiers must have faith on their weapons. Just see this vidieo and see for yourselves how many American soldiers are using AKs. [http://www.VVVVVVVVVVV/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/143982-enough-enough-pakistan-says-no-us-pressure-fm-khar-3.html]

What is the ultimate test for a weapon system? Catch hold of a soldier going out for a patrol or ambush and tell him to pick up a weapon from AK and INSAS. What will the soldier pick up? It is not the intellectual discussion but the faith of soldiers that matters. That faith has not been...