Search results

The answer is - it depends. Against missiles like Nag/HELINA, it will be effective but against something like TOW-2B, not so much. On the other hand, the formers would be better at dealing with tanks equipped with ERA as compared to the other. So it's a trade-off, really.

Hmmm....I stand corrected. I was going off of the figure that had been reported earlier.

Spike-ER, PARS 3, MMP to name a few. All of these have a diameter smaller than that of Nag (the regular version), have a greater range, and reported DOP of 1000-1100 mm after ERA. Besides, what's the guidance mechanism has got to do with DOP??

Actually, the Diameter of the Nag is ~190 cm, so the diameter to dop ratio is even more fucked up than you think.

He's right, you know?? I mean, if we are to take the warhead diameter into account, both Nag and MPATGM seem pretty underwhelming even when compared to stuff from the 90s!! Their only saving grace is that both of those are top attack missiles, hence they don't need as much pen but doesn't change...

Isi lie kahete hain ki saste nashe mat karo.

It should be comparable. In any case, top attack missiles like Nag doesn't really need such a high level of DOP (depth of penetration) as direct attack ATGMs like Kornet E for example as the roof of the MBTs are very thinly armored with thickness almost never exceeding 4 cm of RHA ( could be...