Search results

If it is mango or any other word, I would have no problem with these theories. AUM is different. It is the core of hindu spirituality. If your claim is true and aum came after the interactions with Indian, then it makes aryans nothing special. Aryans are famous because of their scriptures. Aum...

No. Hindu spirituality has nothing do with Gupthas. After the decline of Guptha Empire, there was huge power vacuum in our country. If you read more about the history at that period, you will find brahmin kings who ruled small segments in North West. They never did any great to spirituality or...

I will search them. Sanskrit is convenient to brahmins. After they forgot vedas, they had to make something to stand out. So sanskrit came. Remember the period after Buddhism decline. There was big literature work happened at the time. They replaced vedic hymns with some poems that are...

I don't know. I never followed panini. I more of practical guy. My guruji rarely goes into grammar debates. Can you elaborate what is the importance of it? Only thing I learned, is that sanskrit is derivative of vedic language. So never given much priority to it.

So Constantine Borissoff is expert on sanskrit. Read some of his. . . So he can find error in Rigveda itself. And know how to find the word uses in those slokas. I doubt he know more than what you know. I expected more from you, sir. That guy has next to no understanding of vedic hymns and...

Hindu spirituality revolves around aum. Aryans are great because they know what aum is. Even sankyan like patanjali acknowledge the importance of aum. I thought you would present different view. With out understanding the meaning of the words, how does linguists generalize languages? Language...

I am expecting different arguments from you. Unlike my philosopher friends, you have some understanding of scriptures. AUM is at the core of aryan culture and life. How can you not consider its importance when validating these language theories.

You can't change aum. That is my only objection to all these language theories. There must be some sort of basis, why they categorized the languages in that way.

Aum is important for Aryans. And the sound is first sound according to them. Surely its great pie parents have atleast one mention of it in their yasnas.

Can you explain the continues absence of aum in its sibling language? I checked almost all the languages in same branch. If they are indeed originated from same parent, surely Iranian languages should have mentioned of aum which is very important word in vedic language. I already asked same...

@Razor here is tree regarding PIE. If Iranian languages and Indic languages belongs to same branch, then they should have the word 'aum'. But I found no aum in Iranian languages. here we should understand that, there is no alternative to aum. Aryan wrote millions of slokas regarding aum...

So aum is just regular sound and no implication of anything. Have you read any scriptures? Zoroastrianism which is very close to hinduism, don't have sound like aum in their yasnas.

@pmaitra I know it is an old debate. But I want some clarification on few things. You see, I am having this big fight with some language expert. He is saying that sanskrit is originated from PIE language. I am getting some mixed feeling with the info he is providing. Is there any language...

I want to know what you think of Vedas? I want to know it from your perspective?