Search results

Short sighted people with defeatist attitude have always been a problem in India. Status quo people live in a fantasy. Change is inevitable. The only question is 'Do you want it to be in your favor!?'

We could make Myanmar a "protectorate" and write a constitution for them. Something similar to what US wrote for Japan. We can justify our actions by pointing at the junta. Myanmar will solve multiple problems. NE insurgency, Connection from the NE to the Sea. 100% surrounding BD, Easier access...

https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2023-04/myanmar-building-spy-base-great-coco-island

Article using random render. Got excited for a sec. https://defenceaviationpost.com/indian-navy-inked-%E2%82%B9887-crore-contract-with-lt-for-two-multi-purpose-vessels/amp/ L&T MPV

In this hypothetical collaboration, we should work on our own reactor in parallel. It will be better even if the French are offering their reactor. Navy obviously want N-propulsion since they asked for it on IAC-2 so they must be planning N-propulsion on AC-3. I hope it will be nuclear...

Anybody who is not us is a potential threat. US can be a threat. India will inevitably disagree with the US and relations will go sour (unless India is willing to be their pet) and India is going to need a Navy that can take on US. USN have the capability and the fact that they have the...

Navy should do a repeat order for IAC-2 and maybe join the French program for AC-3. They are designing exactly what IN was asking for.

which is true. India can't protect its trade against a big power like the US in IOR let alone somewhere else. Japan and Korea depends on USN for their security. USN have to co-operate because China soon will be a great Naval power. Something India will not be in the near future. Again, true...

Indian nay could follow three different doctrine in the future. First one is 'Free Rider' stance, it largely relies on outside powers to secure the sea lines of communication and requires a minimum fleet. This is India's current fleet structure. It doesn't have to capability to deny another...

Any idea how many vessels Koreans, Japanese and British inducted in 2022!?

https://news.usni.org/2022/12/27/japanese-mod-releases-details-on-ballistic-missile-defense-ships "The new report from the MoD did not detail the specific dimensions of the proposed ships, but previous reports say the two ships could be as large as 20,000 tons"

I think you mean a parliamentary committee supported the 3rd career. I don't think a random committee have authority to approve things. So it's not going to happen anytime soon. 🤞🤞

IAC2, LHD, NGD, SSN are still under red tape. Probably even the NGC and FSS. No updates.

With Japan spending another 300 billion on military, don't know.

6th is not good enough.

Are these same designs!?

Why is the navy buying these!?

I hope this kind of thought is a minority in the decision making corridors. Their cultural influence and softpower is already dangerously significant. Giving a potential enemy so much power in the military is just simply STUPID. Policies change over night.

That's what makes them different from the rest of cucked out Europe. Weapon purchases have significant geographical ramifications. After the contract is signed, they have the power.