Search results

But it isn't, TEDBF has to materialize,

does it sound more feasible to you than TEDBF? 14000cr for development is not a biggie for IN, it can afford spending 14k cr between the 2024-29 time period with ease. IN is all in for TEDBF,

The first reduction (57 to 36) was due to budget constraints, the one from 36 to 26 is because of the requirement. You don't need 36 fixed wings to operate Vikrant, 26 is optimal.

Debatable, What other option (other than TEDBF) do you suggest?

Have you considered possible deployment at naval air stations? The req could go be more than 100 airframes (including 26 under MRCBF) in 2030s More than 3 quarter TEDBF, The projected cost for development & manufacturing of prototypes is around 14,000cr iirc?

?